The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Together with the development of society, team work is playing an increasingly essential role in organizations and companies, especially in the multi-nation ones. Therefore, the role of leader is considered as the most important contribution to the success of a team. Regarding to this issue, some are of the opinion that the best leaders are the ones who encourage feedback from the team members.
This opinion, to some extent, proves quite plausible and the advocates can come up with strong arguments. To my knowledge, their most convincing argument should be that the primary responsiblily of the leaders is to guarantee the success of the team and achieving the common goals. By encouraging feedback from individuals, team leader can collect diverse ideas, thereby being able to make better decisions. What is more, the development of team is asssociated with the development of each individuals. Therefore, the best leader, by encouraging involvement of each member, can explore the abilities and strengness of each individuals and this will definitely bring benefits either to themselves or to the group in the long run.
On the other side, some people fail to think the statement plausible enough and they, the opponents, can as well bring up their justifications. What is generally accepted is that team leader should concentrate on common goals and in order to complish team achivements, the team leader should be the best one who have a wide range of knowledge. Feedback from the other members can distract the team work and even cause negative effect on final decision of team leader.
All in all, each side of the argument does offer though-provoking arguments related to the role of leaders in driving the team. My own belief is that the best leaders should be one who are willing to receive and give feedback from members.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | anirudh8860 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Loolu | 33 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | kanishkbar4321@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | ez2412 | 62 | view |
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and sup 30
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 302.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09602649007 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93711595735 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503311258278 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9328275809 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.384615385 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144355944831 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631417638437 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368030186496 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100763867739 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105631272606 0.0667264976115 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.