Different school of thoughts have different views on same subject matter. Likewise, every individual has his own set of belief for a particular aspect. I am therefore in complete accordance with the aforementioned stance - The best test of any argument is definitely measured by it's convincing ability with a contrasting view.
Any argument has two parameters- one can either support or oppose a given stance. However, there is no great deal of effort required in convincing a person with a similar mindset as per the argument. Indeed, convincing someone with a familiar taste is relatively easier. Nonetheless, to alter the mindset of a person who staunchly opposes a stand is worth laudable. One can take an example of a tolerant Muslim. In the Muslim clan it is a firm belief that co-education is an offence. Despite of possessing such an orthodox view, if a person is successfully able to counsel the Muslim fellow in sending his child to a school and not a Madarasa, then he/she is a great counselor.
Similarly, a renowned politician with his exemplary oratory can cause myriad of people to follow his word. Accordingly such an entity can either inspire the nation to achieve fruition or brainwash a mob for a terrorist attack. A similar situation was faced by Pakistan. The citizens of Pakistan are subject to constant brainwashing by their leaders. Owing to these issues, the country's name is defamed.
Nevertheless, to it is an art to draw the ball in one's court in an argument. This can be further elaborated with an example of a sale's person. If a salesman wants to send a commodity- an energy bar, and if the customer is unwilling to buy the product, the shrewd sales guy can still sweet talk the customer into buying the eatable. This can be achieved only if the salesman is insightful enough to understand the proclivity of the customer. As in the aforementioned example, it may be probable that the customer is diet conscious. Hence, the sales guy would have convinced him/her in buying the bar by a mere show of it's nutrients and calories.
On the contrary, it becomes equally essential for a person who wishes to prove his point of view to stick to the topic. Many times, an individual has vacillating opinions for an argument. Such a person can neither take a stand of his own, nor would he be capable to prove his stance.
In a nutshell, it can therefore be aptly concluded that in any argument it is rather a creative skill to convince an individual with an apposite thought.
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 75
- The argument to be analyzed is as follows:The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people atten 38
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 35
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 50
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Different school of thoughts have differ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncing ability with a contrasting view. Any argument has two parameters- one can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asa, then he/she is a great counselor. Similarly, a renowned politician with hi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Accordingly,
...se myriad of people to follow his word. Accordingly such an entity can either inspire the n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... issues, the countrys name is defamed. Nevertheless, to it is an art to draw th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ss, to it is an art to draw the ball in ones court in an argument. This can be furth...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re show of its nutrients and calories. On the contrary, it becomes equally esse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld he be capable to prove his stance. In a nutshell, it can therefore be aptly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, hence, however, if, likewise, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78703703704 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87561978115 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532407407407 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7321789253 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.72 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.28 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216288880727 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062475560967 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637755338377 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12291555971 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427560691922 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.