The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
As mentioned in the above claim the argument can be strengthen by convince someone with the oppossing view point. however, the claim mentioned that this convincing is the best test and in my point of view I am not fully agreed with this. this claim can be evaluated in different aspects to bolster my opinion.
First of all, it is clear that if person around us already willing to agree with our ideas our ideas become more week beasuse we do not try to evaluate the idea in every aspects. however, if the audience try to oppose our ideas we can think about the argument in more logical way and our fallicious assumptions can be removed by that. this is why most of the time people discussed about very important ideas and come to the conclussion through the dabates. In debates we try to convince others with opposing view points through providing more logical and relevent examples. From this we can find the loop wholes and unwarranted assumptions of our argument easily.
however, as this claim states this would not be the best way. this can cause of many reasons. if we try to oppose our argument with person who is not educated about the topic we may easily oppose our idea and we may think that our idea is the best because we think that this is the best way to evaluate our argument. Furthermore, we cannot say that the argument is week because the person cannot convince the other party. As a example gallelio Gallely's idea is not aproved by the church and he did not able to convince the argument to them. but still the Galleio idea is worthy and it is accepted by scientific community in all over the world. if gallelio evaluate his idea based on ability convincing he did not able to go further steps, and also lot of inventions and new ideas did not presented to the world.
Otherthan this if we implement new thing our we found new theories from the research we publish journal papers or conference papers to present the idea. In this paper publication procedure the reviewers should accept our idea and to that we should able to present our paper more logicaly with relevent examples. however, in this procedure we do not convince our idea to person who have different view point. we convince our arguments to persons who have more knowledge about the relevent field. In here also the author should able to oppose the idea if the viewers have different opinions but that is not the best way to evalute the whole view point.
As a conclussion, from the above facts and examples it is clear that though our arguments can be strengthen by convincing others with different view points that is not the best way to evaluate the idea.
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. 50
- technology has made children less creative than children in the past. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. Use specific reasons and examples 71
- technology has made children less creative than children in the past. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As mentioned in the above claim the argume...
^^
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... someone with the oppossing view point. however, the claim mentioned that this convinci...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...f view I am not fully agreed with this. this claim can be evaluated in different asp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'our ideas'.
Suggestion: our ideas
...around us already willing to agree with our ideas our ideas become more week beasuse we do not try ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... to evaluate the idea in every aspects. however, if the audience try to oppose our idea...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ous assumptions can be removed by that. this is why most of the time people discusse...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ptions of our argument easily. however, as this claim states this would not be...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... states this would not be the best way. this can cause of many reasons. if we try to...
^^^^
Line 13, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...st way. this can cause of many reasons. if we try to oppose our argument with pers...
^^
Line 13, column 426, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...son cannot convince the other party. As a example gallelio Gallelys idea is not a...
^
Line 13, column 542, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... able to convince the argument to them. but still the Galleio idea is worthy and it...
^^^
Line 13, column 645, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ntific community in all over the world. if gallelio evaluate his idea based on abi...
^^
Line 13, column 789, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'present'
Suggestion: present
...lot of inventions and new ideas did not presented to the world. Otherthan this i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 313, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...r more logicaly with relevent examples. however, in this procedure we do not convince o...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 409, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...o person who have different view point. we convince our arguments to persons who h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64556962025 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40174098758 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.386075949367 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 690.3 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9587214969 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 7.80617977528 192% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119852194156 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507929880142 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041450312289 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936233385929 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277545368345 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.