In any field, leaders represent their society or group, which makes the position of great importance. Leaders should be competitive, but it is also inevident for them to work in coordination with their team members in order to achieve common goals. The prompt suggests that young people should be instilled with a sense of cooperation and not competition to become leaders. I partially disagree with the prompt for the following reasons.
To begin with, to become a leader, a person has to compete with other people for the same position. This makes competitiveness an important aspect of leadership. For instance, if we take the example of politics, two or more parties compete against each other to gain the votes of common people. It becomes essential for the parties to portray their good traits while also undermining the traits of opposition parties. Competitiveness is thus important to make people realise who is better among all the parties and take an informed decision.
Moreover, competitiveness helps us show our potential skills and team leader characteristics. For instance, in a corporate workplace, to become a manager a person has to show leadership skills, communication skills, and also empathise with his peers. Delineating these traits enhances the person's confidence and personality. If the person is capable enough to become a manager, then he will surely succeed with all these traits.
However, it is not just the competitiveness that is important, a person should have a sense of cooperation with their team members. For example, in sports, a person who becomes the captain of a team has to work with every player of his team, know their strengths and weakness, and should be able to use their strengths to their full potential. Thus, cooperation with every member of the team is important for the team leader to gain the trust of its members, and achieve the common goal of making the team victorious.
These examples emphasise the importance of competitiveness as well as cooperation among leaders. No leader is successful in leading their team with just competition or just cooperation. There has to be a right mixture of both traits.
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the south western United States This change however has had little impact 60
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 65
- Government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students 66
- The following appeared in a letter to the school board in the town of Centerville All students should be required to take the driver s education course at Centerville High School In the past two years several accidents in and around Centerville have invol 60
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager One month ago all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one t 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
.... Delineating these traits enhances the persons confidence and personality. If the pers...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, thus, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1323943662 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99496900111 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49014084507 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.763567172 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8947368421 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6842105263 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167723245939 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597975419255 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421404304198 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100122508475 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591198253938 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.