The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
The leaders of tomorrow are todays youth and the discussions and debates on how to raise the existing generations of youth has always been a hot and important topic among the public, policymakers, schools and many more communities. Withing this debate the leading topic of contention has been been whether leaders need to be cooporative in order to be deemed succesful or be highly competitve. While being competitive may feel like the obvious choice for a dominant trait in a leader, as it may - on the face of things- project power and strength, cooporation is actually a trait much more powerful and the subtleness of its strengths actually make a leader more authorotative and convincing.
Firstly, one of the most major tasks of a leader is to negotiate, whether that is negotiating with his/her team to have their back and believe in the the leaderhip or negotiating with counterparties or gevernments. And as we all know, the first rule of negotiation is not try to one up the party you deal with (i.e. compete with them) but rather to understand matters from their vantage point and come up with solutions in which both parties feel like they have won and maintain mutual respect - for these are the negotiations that build string and long term relationships.
Secondly, cooporation allows leaders to build a roport of being trustworthy, equitable and reliable, soft skills that take time develop but build a reputation that is extremely powereful. It builds a reputation that helps in the tough times and it these times that also help define a leader.
It is true that leaders need to maintain a tough stance and expect others to be competing and this forces people to thing that having a stronger sence of competitve is a supirior trait. While leaders need to be on their toes for this, being cooporative actually helps, because when you deal with highly competitve people in a cooporative manner, they are thrown off guard and suddebnly you have the upper hand in the negotiation and also the respect of the counterparty. Infact in some cases the counter party might even mistake your cooporativness for weakness, which again puts you in a stronger position.
In conclusion, while both qualities are important, our young peple must be instilled with a sense of cooporation to help them develop into ideal and impactful leaders. They should be tought the subtle arts and strengths of being cooporative in order to fourish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: been
...ate the leading topic of contention has been been whether leaders need to be cooporative ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... team to have their back and believe in the the leaderhip or negotiating with counterpa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... team to have their back and believe in the the leaderhip or negotiating with counterpa...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtant, our young peple must be instilled with a sense of cooporation to help them...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, in some cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95365853659 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83446410727 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3897171672 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.25 118.986275619 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1666666667 23.4991977007 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.21951772744 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0858024282458 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322493399269 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352481402722 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0470367962069 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302676981173 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.8420337079 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.