The author of the prompt argues that co-operation is a better mindset to adopt than is competition: it allows for better preparation for the workforce. I disagree with this view for two reasons, namely, competition forces us to work efficiently and think innovatively- both of which cannot usually be achieved by means of co-operation.
Competition is very important for producing new ideas. Indeed, it is when we compete with each other that we feel compelled to think outside the box. This is because competition leads to a platform where we are forced to vie with each other for profits. There is more accruement of profits when we are able to provide something unique- something that is not commonplace; hence, the need for competition.
Inevitably, the very competition that leads to innovations also encourages us to provide the best services to our customers. Private companies are the best examples of this phenomenon: they compete with each other to offer the best customer services, which ultimately allows them to triumph over their public counterparts. It comes as no surprise, for instance, that everyone prefers private hospitals to public hospitals because of the former's efficient nature. Such a fact is indicative of the fact that hen a sense of competition is instilled within us, there is likely to be more efficiency in our day to day activities, and hence more customer satisfaction in our services.
Competition, nevertheless, can be very detrimental to a society. When adopting a mindset of competition rather than co-operation, we inevitably come to view most of our counterparts as rivals rather than individuals with whom we can co-operate for the betterment of society. As a result of this hostility, we are unable to accomplish goals that can only be accomplished by means of co-operation. Here the example of climate change is most prominent: companies refuse to accept government enforced environmental regulations because of the fear of losing out on profits, and hence losing out to their competitors. On the contrary, had business organizations co-operated to accept a certain standard of regulations, climate change could be more easily tackled. Such is the problematic implications of adopting a competitive mindset.
Overall, however, it is clear that competition is much better in producing results than is co-operation. Indeed, although it leads to a divisive mentality on the part of competitors, which can potentially be harmful in certain cases, competition allows for the existence of an innovative and efficient workplace that is able to offer better services for society at large.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 66
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study repor 52
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- “Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places” 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, nevertheless, so, still, for instance, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30861244019 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19855385726 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495215311005 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8313053332 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.277777778 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126571291927 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430531570655 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390647647201 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842717741623 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354128398302 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.