The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition
In unity we stand, disunited we fall. The author contends that the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government and other fields is by imbibing a sense of cooperation in them and not competition. I agree with the author, however, a leader must have a competitive spirit too.
Admittedly, team-spirit is key for the success of governance. A leader must be able to work as a team, and he or she must be able to reason with a member of his or her team. The leadership of a system is not a one-man duty, but the reasoning of a board or committee that collude together to lead a group of people either a country or other group. When there is cooperation in the leadership of a system, there is profitability because the people are one and they can work togther to achieve greater heights. For example, A company has a management board that makes the decisions taken by the company, if the management board is not united the company will fail because of conflict of interests among the boared members and if the board members are united the company is more likely to be successfull because the company will be making well premeditated decisions.
Also, it is important that a leader must be able to work with others. Since there is no sector or organisation that does not have a group of individuals as the leadership of the sector. Then the best way to prepare young people for leadership in any sector is to instill cooperation spirit in them. Looking at the Nigerian government for example, we have the President, Vice-President, the Senate, the house of assembly and so on, making decisions for Nigeria as a country, so Nigeria is not a country just controlled by one person let's say the president who makes all the decisions for the country. So, younger generations should be brought up in a way as to value cooperation in leadership in any system.
Finally, Cooperation increase productivity. Two heads is better than one, a government or industry that have a united spirit will have a successfull system; because the quality of decisions is proportional to the reasoning behind the decisions made. So a system that is lead by a group of individuals will make quality decisions that a system that is controlled by just an individual. Such individual may make rash decisions which can be detrimental to the system or sector he or she lead.
Finally, however, a leader must have a competition spirit because to succeed in a business amidst competitors.The leadership of system must be able to compete with others. For example, a company that produce sugar ,must be able to compete with other similar companys that produce sugar. Although, the strength of their competition still lies in the cooperation of the management board of the firm. So, cooperation is key in the leadership of any system and should be instilled in younger generations to have a better system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
- Tradition and modernization are incompatible One must choose between them 66
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 45
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 66
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you discu 50
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p of a system is not a one-man duty, but the reasoning of a board or committee th...
^^
Line 4, column 484, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'leads'.
Suggestion: leads
...ental to the system or sector he or she lead. Finally, however, a leader must have ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ucceed in a business amidst competitors.The leadership of system must be able to co...
^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...or example, a company that produce sugar ,must be able to compete with other simil...
^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er similar companys that produce sugar. Although, the strength of their competition stil...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, may, so, still, then, well, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2400.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7619047619 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91326061786 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.39880952381 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 777.6 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.4270434501 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304178808376 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104128053778 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170228663365 0.0758088955206 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206907305971 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164418409836 0.0667264976115 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.