The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi

Essay topics:

The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

It is always a moot question regarding what to put in the young brigade of a society in terms of cooperation and competition so that will be resulted in an effective leadership. Some liberal people have their credence in teaching them traits of team work or how to remain at peace with fellows whereas on the other side some think that features which include competing with each other should be prioritised. I, personally, reckon that both are complementary to each other and neither of them alone can do what both can achive together.

Revisiting human history and society, it becomes clear that cooperation has helped us in many manners. Human being has successfully dominated this planet by cooperating with each other to trick other beings. For instance, with the help of other people one could be abled to fortify our settlements. Similarly, while developing a society, members of a family, a clan or tribes helped to build generations after generation. Without the support of each other, these things could not be the possibility. Thus, cooperation is ubiquitous in humans since ages.

In view of the above, it becomes significant that our younger generation must have the qualities of cooperating with each other. With this, they can learn to master techniques of doing team work and finishing their targets combined rather than in isolation. Being in a team means a lot. One has an opportunity to learn from peers and to gain from their diverse experiences. Besides, different members have their comparative advantages and with this, they have more chances to achieve better results.

Despite having many benefits of the above, however, characteristics of competition cannot be ignored. This is because by comparing oneself with others in different parameters can show the areas where one lacks or has strengths. By figuring out these things, one would do efforts accordingly to correct it. Moreover, this way, we can obtain optimal performances from individuals which may not be possible in the other case.

Therefore, it can be said that mutual work and comparative tools have an ability to make our adolescents more effective and competitive. With these qualities, they can lead institutions and organisations in a cooperative cum competitive mode.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-31 ekarumeblessing@icloud.com 79 view
2024-08-31 hainess25 70 view
2024-08-28 Rishab@1999 50 view
2024-07-02 MMoksha 66 view
2024-06-30 AkellaSrinivas 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Jasman23 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s an opportunity to learn from peers and to gain from their diverse experiences. ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19073569482 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91386542337 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572207084469 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2980326408 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.35 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124806018793 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385694359242 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358898228554 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712933471143 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423285367585 0.0667264976115 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.