Some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one s ability to relate and connect to other people Others believe that this ability is better cultivated by living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that comm

Essay topics:

Some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one’s ability
to relate and connect to other people. Others believe that this ability is better cultivated by
living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that community.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own
position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

There is a general confusion among pundits that what is the right way to build interpersonnel engagements with an aim of knowing others. I, personally, reckon that by meeting different and diverse people is the more genuine way to get the knowledge of the population and their activities.

The foremost thing in visiting different places is having more interactions with varied people which results in more relations and bonds. Wherever one goes, it is must for that person to deal with the population of that areas provided the individual's objective is not to live an ascetic life. There would be meetings with those people through community meetings, public works or institutional engagements. For instance, whenever an employee got transferred from one place to other, she has to go through unfamiliar faces while working in office or residing in new settlement. Under these ineluctable conditions, relations and bonds automatically develop. However, contrarily, when a person resides in a single place for a long time, things like population with whom that person interacts become quotidian and after some time there would be less new things to learn and more chances of creation of friction among the people which may, further, conclude in scuffles.

Apart from the above benefits of wandering to varied places to build connections with other beings, there is one more thing which can't be ignored here. In the present world of multiculturalism whose aim is to develop fair and equal society, diversity can be better understood by understanding diverse cultures and traditions. For example, indigenious populations are still separated from the mainstream world in many parts of the planet. It is almost impossible to get through their things by just reading texts, instead, it is preferable to engage with them throught various methods, like trade, cultural exchange programmes and by assuaging their fear by giving them chance to visit the developed parts of the world. But this cannot be feasible by just sitting in one place of these communities because there is a chance that may be the place not fully represent that particular culture and their way of living.

Therefore, it can be said that more places help us to provide more representations and with those disparate experiences one can develop more abilites to interact with others. It is good for humanity as well to know other beings to learn from them those things which one himself do not possess.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-09 guozhishan 58 view
2023-10-06 AmieeZhao 66 view
2023-08-13 Anish Sapkota 66 view
2023-08-03 mana000 50 view
2023-07-28 Umaima Khan 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Jasman23 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...r beings, there is one more thing which cant be ignored here. In the present world o...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, apart from, as to, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15422885572 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81863958158 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544776119403 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.189939085 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.133333333 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18919954542 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669635027707 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413656174282 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108996670452 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051061484752 0.0667264976115 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.