The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The rapid economy development is largely boosting people’s consuming ability. It is conceivable that as the amount of consumption surges, households are likely to generate more waste than ever before. The enormous consumer-generated waste needs to be removed out of towns and cities, which may result in occupation and damage of natural lands in suburban area. Trashes like plastics and batteries are most detrimental to natural environment, although most of these trashes have been recycled.
The statement suggests that in order to solve the problems incurred by consumer-generated waste, the amount of trash accepted from each household should be strictly limited. However, it doesn’t take into consideration the fact that the characteristics of the waste itself is more critical than the amount of the waste. In other words, some tiny trash may cause more harm to the environment than others with large size. For example, a used battery that is disposed casually can eliminate a square meters’ land’s fertilization, while several bags of waste food that is hundreds times heavier than the battery may be digested by the natural environment. Thus, a better way to minimize the detrimental influence of consumer-generated waste is to focus on the type of the waste rather than the amount.
In addition, different types of household may generate different kinds of waste that are of varied amount. It will be difficult to determine the exact amount of waste accepted from each household. For example, rich households may have more consuming ability and generate more consumer waste than poor households. Whether we should impose different standards based on the income of each households is highly controversial. We are unable to determine the damage caused by each households, which is an important yardstick to decide how much trash we should accept from them.
For the city government, such regulations may generate large amount of excessive work that needs more labor. In order to supervise people’s compliance to the regulations, additional recorders and facilities are needed. Designated areas for each household to dispose their trash may be built which may occupy more public spaces. It is also possible that people may be required to label their trash and weigh their trash themselves. Some people may dump their trash into their neighbor’s designated areas secretly in order to dispose more trash they generate. Such behaviors may ask for additional modification of laws and regulations.
Although excessive consumer-generated waste is a serious problem, it seems unreasonable to place a limit on the amount of trash accepted from each household. We have had better measures such as separate the trash in terms of their recyclability. Based on the separation, what may seem more reasonable is that we impose limit on the amount of trash that are most harmful to the environment, such as un-degradable plastics accepted from each households. This may restrict people’s consumption on the products and produce less detrimental effect on the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 75
- The following appeared in a memo from New Ventures Consulting to the president of HobCo, Inc., a chain of hobby shops."Our team has completed its research on suitable building sites for a new HobCo hobby Shop in the city of Grilldon. We discovered that th 50
Comments
Could anyone give me some
Could anyone give me some suggestions? Thanks!
The essay is under estimated
The essay is under estimated by the e-grader. It can reach 5.0 out of 6 because of good arguments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re consumer waste than poor households. Whether we should impose different standards ba...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'as for', 'for example', 'in addition', 'such as', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.249523809524 0.240241500013 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.15619047619 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.12380952381 0.0880659088768 141% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0266666666667 0.0497285424764 54% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0380952380952 0.0444667217837 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137142857143 0.12292977631 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0419047619048 0.0406280797675 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.09023711593 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.032380952381 0.030933414821 105% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0895238095238 0.0997080785238 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0342857142857 0.0249443105267 137% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0190476190476 0.0148568991511 128% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3089.0 2732.02544248 113% => OK
No of words: 484.0 452.878318584 107% => OK
Chars per words: 6.38223140496 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376033057851 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.297520661157 0.280924506359 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.243801652893 0.200843997647 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.161157024793 0.132149295362 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09023711593 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 219.290929204 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462809917355 0.48968727796 95% => OK
Word variations: 52.636269231 55.4138127331 95% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1666666667 23.380412469 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9432827828 59.4972553346 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.708333333 141.124799967 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.380412469 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 49.9187327824 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.93965517241 1.64882698954 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49213260972 0.391690518653 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113306300859 0.123202303941 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0852260389441 0.077325440228 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528379811083 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130047466679 0.149214159877 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18694510664 0.161403998019 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101149459965 0.0892212321368 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.359679540387 0.385218514788 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0686312092718 0.0692045440612 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331848148364 0.275328986314 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636896834336 0.0653680567796 97% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.30420353982 245% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 13.0 3.66592920354 355% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 22.0 13.5995575221 162% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.