The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
The problem of waste management is not new to any household. Wate generated by household end up in a dump yard or a river which cause damage to our environment.
Applying strict limits would bring awareness to consumers about what waste can be recycled and what cannot be recycled. Generally, people do not think about what to the stuff they are putting in the dustbin can be used later on. Limits will definitely bring change in the lives of people as they will think twice before putting something to thrash. Municipalities should also make people aware that how can the usual stuff can be made useful.
Packaging accounts for more than 60% of a household waste which mostly comprises of plastics. Though the cost of producing plastic is negligent as compared to the cost of alternatives used for packaging nevertheless causes more damage to the environment. It is from the side of the consumer to curb the use of plastic and make use of recycled stuff. For example, if a person wants to buy dairy or poultry, he/she should carry a steel container in which they can carry it safely back to their home.
The environment is not only getting polluted by the household waste but also there are other factors which harm the environment. Today the waste released by industries into air and water bodies is something which cannot be ignored. Officials should keep a regular check on these industries also.
New rules and regulation can be painstaking at first but when there is a huge problem like environmental damage, change is required. The best way would be to change the mentality of the people about what they think is waste and what is not. And when there is awareness amongst to people, that would be the best gift mankind can give to the scenic environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a business magazine."As a result of numerous complaints of dizziness and nausea on the part of consumers of Promofoods tuna, the company requested that eight million cans of its tuna be returned for testing. Promofoods concluded 37
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times. 50
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company."Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One 25
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...n 60% of a household waste which mostly comprises of plastics. Though the cost of producing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...eep a regular check on these industries also. New rules and regulation can be pains...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 307.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75244299674 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60606676729 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517915309446 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7678942679 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.1875 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1875 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221707576996 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745205195731 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448456887482 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123413564854 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414581720109 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.