The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Indeed, one of the major sources of environment problem is consumer generated waste. Most of the time we mixed up all organic, inorganic, recycle and non-recycle waste in single dustbin, which creates a lot of environment problem because it is difficult to segregate that waste. Therefore it ultimately pollutes the environment. To solve this problem, given statement suggest if we apply a rule of accepting limited amount of trash from each household, it can prevent the problem caused by this waste. It seems reasonable but not practical.
To put a limit on the amount of trash not only creates problem for each household, it will also create disagreement among the people. To produce fixed amount of trash is very difficult for each house. And after this rule government will accept only fixed amount of waste, in that condition people will not know what they will do with rest of the waste. And finally, they will try to dispose of the rest of the waste illegally. This act will definitely create more harm to the environment rather than solving it.
Additionally, it is very difficult to put limit on each house. For example, a house having 4 members generates less waste than a house having 6 and 8 members. If the government try to put the same limit on both the house will be unfair and will be opposed by the people. Similarly, to put a limit as per the family size will be a burdensome task for the government. So, to design this complete system is very difficult and also not pragmatic.
However, limiting the waste amount will force people to think that they should reduce their waste and help to save the environment. But on the other hand, we can not also ignore the above mentioned problem. Rather than imposing this act, the government should educate the people about this. They should additionally focus on other methods like recycling organic waste into fertilizers and ban on the plastics, which can help to save environment in a more effective way.
All of the above points defines that this policy is not only difficult to apply but also do more harm to the environment. Therefore, the government should look at the different policy to save the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...t is difficult to segregate that waste. Therefore it ultimately pollutes the environment....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...environment in a more effective way. All of the above points defines that this policy i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, similarly, so, therefore, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83244680851 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63747064717 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460106382979 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0176509719 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5238095238 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9047619048 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35453720399 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970743382672 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774331704658 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177970610238 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877574987651 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.