The statement claims that in order to solve environment problems caused by consumer-generated waste, towns and cities should impose strict limits on amount of trash that they will accept from each household. This statement aims to solve waste management problem by reducing amount of waste generated but this solution is impractical and is bound to fail. Also, this statement is parochial as it only suggests to restrict waste generation in cities and towns but doesn't suggest any waste management solution for rural areas which might also be a major contributor to amount of waste generated.
Although government of a nation can issue guidelines and urge its citizen to reduce amount of waste, they generate on daily basis but this can reduce waste generation only up to a certain extent. Moreover, if stringent policies are enforced to encourage less waste generation then this may lead to people dumping waste illegally and thereby causing more environment problems. It is impractical for citizens to reduce waste generation beyond a certain limit and therefore other effective waste management techniques also needs to be employed concurrently.
In tandem with issuing guidelines for reducing trash generated daily, there are many other techniques which can be employed for effective waste management. One such solution is to create market for home-made compost and encouraging citizens to use biodegradable kitchen waste for creating compost. Thus, citizen will be able to earn some money as well as able to contribute to reduced waste generation. This will also help economy of country and will reduce use of non-renewable energy source for energy generation.
For non-biodegradable waste such as plastic which is detrimental to environment as it doesn't decompose in environment, one of the solution can be to use process of incineration which involves combustion of organic substances contained in waste materials. It converts waste into ash, fuel gas and heat. One might argue that this solution may cause surge in pollution because of carbon footprint but this process produces paucity of pollutants and is comparatively much better than land filling of waste.
One can challenge above solution by asserting that it can create economical burden and requires pecunious government for setting infrastructure required. But this solution is much more practical and feasible when compared to forcing citizens to reduce waste generated. Thus the problem of waste management can be judiciously addressed if citizens are encouraged to manage their waste effectively rather then enforcing strict policies which might cause illegal dumping of waste by them.
- Advances in transportation and communication like the airplane and telephone have changed the way that nations interact with each other in a global society. chose another technological that you think that is important. Give specific reasons for your choic 76
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 58
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced 69
- Describe jet streams by using the information in the reading, and provide examples of the way that they affect air travel by drawing on the material that you heard in the lecture. 66
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests restricting'.
Suggestion: suggests restricting
... this statement is parochial as it only suggests to restrict waste generation in cities and towns bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 463, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...aste generation in cities and towns but doesnt suggest any waste management solution f...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...rced to encourage less waste generation then this may lead to people dumping waste i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ich is detrimental to environment as it doesnt decompose in environment, one of the so...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 270, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ing citizens to reduce waste generated. Thus the problem of waste management can be ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sly addressed if citizens are encouraged to manage their waste effectively rather...
^^
Line 9, column 405, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...o manage their waste effectively rather then enforcing strict policies which might c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2258.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46731234867 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94618703704 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498789346247 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.758737428 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.125 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8125 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279464175713 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106125147489 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100833405508 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171530048914 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096884840717 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 48.8420337079 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.