Sovereignty and culture are two important aspects to gauge a nation's progress. The question here is should a country place same emphasis and invest as much in art as to maintain its autonomy. I believe that a nation should decide on investment by keeping in mind economic conditions and other important aspects that country needs to address on priority.
The claim that government should invest equivalent amount in arts and as it does to maintain its military is illogical. The investment need not necessarily be equivalent and it might differ from nation to nation based on multiple factors that I will further explore to make my stand cogent.
To say that a country should invest as much in arts as in military is mawkish and impractical in many cases such as for developing and underdeveloped nations. Although I agree that a nation should encourage its citizen to learn art and promote it, as it reflects nation’s tradition and culture. It might seem plausible for nations like U.S., U.K. and other developed nations to invest more and more amounts for arts and recreational activity. For under developed and developing nations it is pragmatic to address critical issues like poverty, lower standard of living and medical ailments of its citizens rather then to invest more in arts.
There are plenty of examples in today’s world where different countries are trying to establish their supremacy and dominance in world. With terrorism burgeoning at faster pace than ever it is even more important now than ever for countries to maintain their territorial integrity and this can be done only when they have a powerful military and advanced state of art weapons. With fast evolving technology and innovation, it is precarious for nation’s integrity to have under developed military. So, it might not be feasible for economically weak countries to keep the same share of budget for arts as it might do for its military.
One might argue that investment done in arts might give good returns to a nation in form of increased exports of artefacts such as handicrafts and increased tourism and a nation should not refrain from making more investments in arts. This might seem practical but to aver that government should create an equivalent share in budget for arts and recreation as it does for military is bound to fail. A country without a strong military will not be able to maintain integrity and stability it will definitely hinder growth of nation including its arts sector. Thus, above arguments falls apart.
I think a strong military can help arts to flourish as global investors are more likely to invest in a stable market which will eventually provide a boost to development of sophisticated art industry. Although it is important for government to make sure that a nation flourishes in all dimensions including arts but decisions regarding investments should be based on its long-term goals for which stability and integrity are essential.
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Companies that rece 80
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 42
- Describe jet streams by using the information in the reading, and provide examples of the way that they affect air travel by drawing on the material that you heard in the lecture. 66
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 66
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...e a nations progress. The question here is should a country place same emphasis an...
^^
Line 4, column 618, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...medical ailments of its citizens rather then to invest more in arts. There are pl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, then, thus, as for, as to, i think, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2495.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09183673469 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82334307853 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465306122449 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0051325428 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.315789474 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7894736842 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18811792947 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708851398628 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461836683101 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112466877461 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365917613861 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.