The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
The prompt says that best way to teach one is to praise the positive actions rather than says the negative ones. Although, this is a good way to deliver the information for one and teach him, but it’s not effective enough to teach anyone his/her mistakes for several reasons.
Firstly, if someone always listens to the positive things that he does, how can he and when know about his/ her mistakes to improve himself. For example, if CEO in a company and wants to release a new product to a new market without any statistical study for this market about the population, and if this product will achieve the desired sales or not. Then, after releasing the product, it faces deadly failure and wasn’t lucrative. In this case, how can the company’s owner doesn’t take action with this manager. Let’s assume the stand point of the argument, that owner will praise the CEO and will not say negative things, how this CEO discerns his significant mistakes, and as a corollary will reprise this wrongs again and again. The example illustrates to what extent the saying negative things is important and significant in such poisitions like a manager or leader for subordinates. Otherwise, all those subordinates will repeat the same mistakes naively due to they didn’t mention about negative things only they are being braised for positive things.
Secondly, there are two types of criticism to teach people about their mistakes, first one a destructive critisim, which is just stating and listing the wrongs and drawbackes. However, the second one is more effective, the constructive criticism, which is consider the mistakes as crucial steps the one should pass through them to be taught. In this kind of criticism you can teach without stultifing the one who did the mistake. For example, in the modern technique in eduacting the children, they rely on praising the positive action first then saying the negative things later. This technique is just acting as a pave fot the child to listen to your instruction and to encourage him to enhance himself. Thus, it is indispensible to say negative things but first adopt positive things.
Inconclusion, to teach one in effective way that is not only to teach by say only negative acyions or his/her mistakes. However, to deliver this criticism by acceptable way should say positive thing first then say and explain what are the negative things which need to be removed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | sefeliz | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby 58
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 66
- In the 1950s Torreya Taxifolia a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out No one is sure exactly what caused the decline but chances are good that if nothing is done Torreya will soon become extinct Experts are co 85
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le illustrates to what extent the saying negative things is important and signifi...
^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...e, the constructive criticism, which is consider the mistakes as crucial steps the one s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 615, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...later. This technique is just acting as a pave fot the child to listen to your instruc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99507389163 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59556365095 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502463054187 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9239713906 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.294117647 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8823529412 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309859650834 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111799131851 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121980250351 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249695643206 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127900228897 0.0667264976115 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.