The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
I absolutely agree with the first section of the statement above, but find fault with the latter half. There is no doubt that praising positive actions is an excellent way to teach, and this method is most clearly exemplified when dealing with much younger children. When a young child is learning basic social behavior, it is imperative that he is encouraged to repeat positive actions. For example, when a child voluntarily shares his toys with another, if a teacher rewards that behavior, the child will understand that this is a good practice, and likely share again in the future. In contrast, if a child displays negative behavior by stealing a toy away from his playmate, it would be very dangerous for the teacher to ignore this action, for then the child may never recognize that this is unacceptable. In this instance, the child has not learned from the situation at all. So what should a teacher do when faced with such a situation? Punishment is not necessarily the optimal choice, either. Rather than scolding a child for mistreating his playmates and sending him off to a corner, a teacher would be wise to demonstrate the positive alternative: to share his toys instead. In this case, rather than ignoring or punishing negative actions, the teacher could seize the opportunity to reinforce positive behavior, and further extend the child’s learning experience. In summary, positive reinforcement is certainly an excellent method for teaching new methods or behaviors, and encouraging a student to learn more. However to ignore, rather than recognize and correct negative actions, would be a disservice to the student, for he would not know what conclusion to draw from his action.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-29 | tester340 | 83 | view |
- In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today 63
- In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today 70
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 73
- In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today 80
- In twenty year there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1365, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
...and further extend the child’s learning experience. In summary, positive reinforcement is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1525, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nd encouraging a student to learn more. However to ignore, rather than recognize and co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, then, for example, in contrast, in summary, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 280.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06428571429 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80104754457 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560714285714 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8976320072 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163166090048 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058984701452 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688745786125 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163166090048 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.