The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or
disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position
you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific
circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be
advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
There are various ways of teaching people things. Here, prompt recommends that the best way to educate someone is to disregard their negative actions and to encourage more postive actions. I strongly disagree with the statement and argue that to ignore negative actions is not the best way to educate someone.
To begin, ignorance of negative actions will lead to more neagtive actions. If the negative actions of people who are being taught are ignored then they will not learn. For instance, if a child is never told that picking nose in public is not hygenic and that action of the child is ignored then, he/she will keep on picking his/her nose in public. It is resposibility of the educator to check the negative actions and provide necessary recommendation required. In the above example, the child can be persuaded to not pick nose in public and she/he will eventually stop doing so. So, to let the negative actions go uncheked is not the way teach someone.
Secondly, history tells us that punishment, criticism, censurement etc have been required to restrain the negative actions of people. If the negative actions are always ignored then it will not be fair to the people who are doing good. The above mentioned tools like punishment, scolding, fines, etc are much needed in the society and they are essential tools in learning process. But that does not mean that the punishment should be harsh or anything like that. However, negative actions should not go unchecked as it may have some dangerous consequences.
Thirdly, for children only to praise postive actions in the fear that punishment or scolding may damage the psychology of the child may have some different consequences. The children may not even discern between neagtive and positive action if negative action is to go unchecked. Moreover, he/she may even come to the conclusion that negative actions of ours do not have any consequences. As a result of which children when they grow up may not think about their consequences of their neagtive actions. Therefore, there should be a mechanism to restrain the neagtive actions in the learing process.
However, one might argue that positive reinforcement of the good behavior can persuade people to do good things and other people can learn from the example of postive behavior. But, it might not hold true for all people. And history has showed us that people are more aware of their actions if for similar actions others are punished.
In conclusion, I think that the best way to teach is to both praise postive actions while negative actions should be checked with punishment, criticism, scolding,etc.
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment building to its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately one 63
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 83
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 50
- The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria."Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry. In order to stop the erosion, we should charge people 82
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice for a client."Most homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last heating season 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ons will lead to more neagtive actions. If the negative actions of people who are ...
^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...estrain the negative actions of people. If the negative actions are always ignored...
^^
Line 9, column 373, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...nd they are essential tools in learning process. But that does not mean that the punish...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 390, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s of ours do not have any consequences. As a result of which children when they gr...
^^
Line 23, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , etc
...ked with punishment, criticism, scolding,etc.
^^^^
Line 23, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith punishment, criticism, scolding,etc.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05466970387 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63568985397 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439635535308 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5560915045 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4782608696 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0869565217 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26086956522 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203608486182 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724191688429 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509721032086 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12603758916 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547453466136 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.