Learning is part and parcel of human life. It is always mentioned in various books that "A man/ woman should never stop learning, no matter how old he/ she is". Everyone around us teach us something or the other in some or the other way. The statement made above states that the Best way to teach someone is to praise the good habits and ignore the bad ones.
When we look back to our childhood, the student years of our life, we remember our teachers, their teachings, rewards and sometimes punishments as well. Punishments have been a vital part in order to improve students' behavior. However, some of these scare the students. On the other hand, remembering the rewards we received due to proper conduct in school makes us happy. Thus, it is highly recommended for teachers to praise the positive actions of students. Many times, the bad actions, like chattering in class, are done to attract attention of the whole class. Students doing such acts are the one's who do not receive and attention and want to seek, no matter what. Ignoring such activities, will definitely lessen the amount of mischievous activities in school.
It is however important to circumscribe a definite distinction between the positive and negative actions. As for example, a teacher might ignore small things like talking in class, which do not do any physical harm to the neighboring students, but he/ she cannot directly ignore strong fights between students in classrooms, canteens etc. Ignoring such activities would lead to increase in tendency of students to fight. Physical fights, abusive language, and many acts of such ilk cannot be ignored. Let's take an example of the most common fable we are told in childhood. There was once a boy who used to steal pens from his classmates. His teacher and mother ignored this habit of his and didn't mind. It developed in the mind of the boy that stealing things is not a bad habit and everyone ignores, if you steal something from someone. Boy, in this fable, turned out to be an experienced thief after growing up. He was caught by police and sentenced to jail. His mother then regretted her ignorance to her child's activities in childhood. Hence it can be said that directly ignoring negative activities without any thought can turn out to be harmful for student's future.
Summing up, I agree with the fact that on should praise positive habits but should not directly ignore the negative ones. The negative actions should be properly defined as to not harm anyone physically.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
- “Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending m 59
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake Houserestaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little imp 82
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...roper conduct in school makes us happy. Thus it is highly recommended for teachers t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 466, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
... the positive actions of students. Many a times, the bad actions, like chattering in cl...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 502, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...any acts of such ilk cannot be ignored. Lets take an example of the most common fabl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 692, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nd mother ignored this habit of his and didnt mind. It developed in the mind of the b...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1041, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... to her childs activities in childhood. Hence it can be said that directly ignoring n...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... out to be harmful for students future. Summing up, I agree with the fact that o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 15, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...students future. Summing up, I agree with the fact that on should praise positive habits but sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, so, then, thus, well, as for, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2102.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88837209302 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54990641298 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560465116279 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3600434165 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8461538462 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177474578215 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413540585883 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057848498078 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106938572121 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423205556966 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.