The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positio

Essay topics:

The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Positive actions are not necessarily a result of positive teachings. Imparting knowledge and wisdom related to various fields consitues what we today know as teaching. Teaching can be both a formal or an informal process but ignoring negative actions when teaching do more harm than we can estimate.

Empahsis should be laid on differentiating positive actions from the negative ones. Merely praising positive actions by eduactors, employers and parents will lead to incompelete knowledge at the receiving end. One cannot know what is right and what is wrong if the complete scenario is nor presented infront of him or her. For example, if in a school moral values are not taught and only certain aspects like respecting elders or sharing food with others is highlighted, then the pupils might not know the flipside of the situation. In such an uncertain situation, the child might not know how to react leading to embarassment and self-pity. It may hamper his self-confidence for a long time.

Similarly, when a person goes for job interviews, the priliminary induction given to him is the dos and donts of the company. For instance, talking rudely to your peers is not accepted as a good code of conduct in any organisation. If the employer simply ignores ceratin red flags like these, then employee productivity is bound to go down thereby affecting the organisation as a whole. Ofcourse, there can be certain scenarios where focusing on the positive actions may have led to a more "outcome driven approach" such as meeting sales targets but in the long run, concentrating on praising postive actions is far-fetched.

We have specific institues like correction centers, juviline care homes etc where differences between positive and negavtive actions are highlighted to give the participants a more holistic view. The success rate of these facilities prove that praising positive actions while ignoring negative ones is not the best way to teach. Even parents from a young age should imbibe in their children the sense of right and wrong. These children will grow up to be the future leaders of our nation and thus, should be well aware of the pros and cons associated with each decision.

Hence, the best way to teach, is to elaborate both on positive and negative actions so that a person can make the right choices for himself and others.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-22 Celestina Asantewaa 50 view
2024-08-26 aaa111 33 view
2024-07-13 sepnkycehmqcodjefl 50 view
2024-04-17 guozhishan 50 view
2023-12-28 mei_unavailable 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ani8 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and cons associated with each decision. Hence, the best way to teach, is to elab...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, similarly, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06923076923 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84771151646 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3139488587 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.833333333 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200021115611 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630628323109 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659563693673 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117781674773 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261512496247 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.