In business education and government, it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust.
Leaders is the art of motivating and guiding people to work towards a common goal. The ability of leader lies in how well he coordinates and works with the team to complete a task. For a leader to succeed the most important quality or trait one should possess is the trust of his team. So usually people prefer leaders with experience in the respective field.
Indisputably, it is not always good to be skeptical of the new leaders as one cannot be denied the opportunity to not to work as a leader just because he did not have any prior experience. If you see in the history many great things and key movements were led by new leaders. For example; Elon musk who is now renowned for his electric vehicles and space shuttles in the world had no prior experience in this field. He established a brand for himself which is pioneer from cars, batteries to space shuttles. He is now working towards his vision to make extra territorial life on mars.No one has even dreamt of selling the ventures on mars as his vision. So sometimes it is not the experience but capability matters.
Nevertheless, it is good to prefer people with experience as leaders. With experienced person as leader, Team works with confidence and trust. The team works without any doubt as theyt are confident enough that even if something goes wrong there will be a person who can correct them. For example, if you take a business leader who has a task to launch a new product in market has experiences which he gained while working with other products and know all the steps on should take even if any case of adversity occurs. He knows how to handle different markets, pricing and how to deal with fluctuations in economy. So all the possible bottlenecks are taken care of even before the product is lauched as such risk involved is decreased to minimum.
Thus, I generally agree with the opinion that it is appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders as trust and belief are essential while working as a team to get the desired result. But I would also like to consider not only experience that but also to look at the person holistically by knowing his vision, talent, ideas and capability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | guozhishan | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | graceeehgq | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 50 | view |
- Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to widen the highway adding an additional lane of traffic But last 58
- Traveling to other countries is a way for people to take time away from their daily worries While visiting a foreign country some people like to go to the tourist attractions while others prefer going to quiet places where they can truly enjoy the country 73
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- Print media, including Magazines and newspapers, will soon be completely replaced by internet news source. 66
- Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to widen the highway adding an additional lane of traffic But last
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 585, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: No
... to make extra territorial life on mars.No one has even dreamt of selling the vent...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63989637306 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60248731278 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528497409326 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8854988243 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174068931035 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579384891261 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718190685177 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122279932961 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379157142629 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.