In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The question of whether skepticism should be the default approach when evaluating new leaders in sectors such as business, education, and government is a topic that invites thoughtful consideration. Skepticism is often seen as a healthy mechanism to ensure accountability and protect against potential mismanagement. While it is essential to recognize the value of trust in leadership, maintaining an initial level of skepticism until leaders prove their credibility is indeed an approach that holds merit. By fostering transparency, encouraging effective leadership development, and guarding against potential abuse of power, this approach contributes positively to these sectors.
Skepticism toward new leaders acts as a catalyst for promoting transparency and accountability. When leaders are aware that their actions are subject to close scrutiny, they are more inclined to make well-informed and ethical decisions. For example, in the corporate world, the Enron scandal highlighted the consequences of blind trust in leadership. By remaining skeptical initially, stakeholders can prevent such instances and encourage leaders to operate with transparency, thus fostering a culture of trust and responsibility.
Skepticism toward new leaders is not a display of cynicism but rather a means to promote effective leadership development. Leaders who are aware that their credibility is under scrutiny are more likely to invest in their own growth and demonstrate their competence. This approach can be particularly impactful in education, where the quality of leadership directly influences the learning environment. Skeptical evaluation ensures that education administrators prioritize their roles, fostering a conducive space for students to thrive.
Skepticism serves as a safeguard against potential mismanagement and misuse of power. A skeptical approach encourages leaders to act in the best interest of the organization, institution, or public they serve. In government, where power can be easily abused, an initial dose of skepticism can prevent corruption and ensure public officials act with integrity. Recent political scandals involving misuse of funds and authority serve as stark reminders of the importance of skepticism in guarding against such abuses.
While skepticism is beneficial, it is important to strike a balance between skepticism and trust. Once leaders demonstrate their trustworthiness, it is crucial to pivot toward fostering a culture of support and collaboration. Excessive skepticism can hinder progress and create an environment of constant suspicion. Therefore, the key lies in transitioning from skepticism to trust when leaders establish their credibility.
In conclusion, the practice of maintaining skepticism toward new leaders until they prove their worth is a prudent approach that encourages transparency, effective leadership development, and safeguards against potential mismanagement. While trust is a cornerstone of successful leadership, skepticism acts as a necessary mechanism to ensure leaders uphold their responsibilities. By fostering a balance between skepticism and trust, we can create an environment where leaders are held accountable, institutions thrive, and society benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | guozhishan | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | graceeehgq | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 50 | view |
- In business education and government it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree disagree with the claim In developi 16
- Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals 83
- Claim Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university courses Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 66
- Issue Task In business education and government it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the cla 66
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether skepticism should be the default approa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
...aware that their actions are subject to close scrutiny, they are more inclined to make well-in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2793.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08496732026 5.05705443957 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4338483996 2.79657885939 123% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492374727669 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 871.2 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6402838004 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.434782609 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9565217391 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21739130435 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194581255181 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684340696144 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419875017996 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124367245878 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342894323871 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 48.8420337079 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.98 12.1639044944 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether skepticism should be the default approa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
...aware that their actions are subject to close scrutiny, they are more inclined to make well-in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2793.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08496732026 5.05705443957 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4338483996 2.79657885939 123% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492374727669 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 871.2 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6402838004 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.434782609 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9565217391 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21739130435 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194581255181 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684340696144 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419875017996 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124367245878 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342894323871 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 48.8420337079 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.98 12.1639044944 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.