Issue Task - In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Since the very beginning of human civilisation, humans had a tendency of choosing leaders who are responsible for taking important decisions for their community and guiding them in a particular direction. A good leader can prove to be instrumental in enhancing growth of any organisation and ensuring prosperity of a community. The given prompt suggests that in any field people should not blindly trust every decision taken by their leaders until they have proven themselves. I believe, in the modern world this statement doesn’t hold any ground and, in my opinion, skepticism among the general public about their leaders can substantially reduce the effectiveness of the governing authority and can harm the social order of a society. There are a variety of reasons which can be given to justify my position.
To begin, it is a proven fact both by observation and historical facts that any society, organisation or enterprise can never progress if the people started to doubt their leaders. For instance, there is an organisation where a new CEO is appointed and he has offered some changes in the working structure of the company as well as has suggested future plan on which company should work. But since he is a new leader, people started to doubt his capabilities and worked according to their own will and personal conscience. It doesn’t take any rocket science to predict company’s future trajectory. This kind of approach will undoubtedly lead to a great amount of chaos and disorder in the organisation which will consequently lead to decline in the current growth rate of the company. It is evident from the given example that it is imperative to have a proper chain of command with proper discipline to maintain a suitable social order in any organisation.
Furthermore, it should be acknowledged that if a leader has reached to a particular position, he must be having a substantial amount of credibility and would have already proven himself. In the modern contemporary world where whole humanity has evolved so much, it takes a great amount of effort and perseverance to reach a dignified position in any field. Whether be it in the field of business where it takes years for someone to reach a managerial post or be it the case of democratic societies where it takes trust of millions of people to get to a leadership position, all these cases are testament to the capabilities and calibre of any leader in any field in the modern society. I am not saying that these leaders will always take the right decisions and I am also not denying that people should protest if something seems wrong, my only argument is that to ensure sustainable development in any organisation it is necessary that people have a certain amount of trust in their leaders.
In summary, it is understandable to be a little skeptic about a novice leader and constant suggestions by the workers or the public can be beneficial both for the leader as well as the organisation but, not trusting him seems a little too extreme since it can have severe implications on the discipline and progress of the institution. Afterall, history is evident of the fact that any society with great achievements was always led by a strong leader and a strong leader can never survive without the trust of his people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | guozhishan | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | graceeehgq | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 75
- Issue Task In business education and government it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the cla 66
- Claim In any situation the best way to persuade other people is to present them with facts and statistics rather than with emotional arguments Reason Facts are objective so they are more persuasive than subjective appeals Write a response in which you dis 58
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 83
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 589, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nd, in my opinion, skepticism among the general public about their leaders can substantially r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...c can be beneficial both for the leader as well as the organisation but, not trusting him ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...ipline and progress of the institution. Afterall, history is evident of the fact that an...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, well, for instance, in summary, kind of, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2745.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 558.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91935483871 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92596135577 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460573476703 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 882.9 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.980043481 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.470588235 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8235294118 23.4991977007 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144174978975 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050751478046 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343262689972 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994655690921 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344856363338 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.