This statement links up to success in four different field following same method that is revitalization of power during specific time interval. Success is depend on many factors not a single one also it may rely on more things not only highest power of its organization. However, it is too hard to say that only new leadership change policy brings success in any fields.
Firstly, business, politics, educaion and government are four different fields. No connection between them not only their management system but also everything are differ to each other. Like business are managed by its owner. No one can interfare there. It is totally vague idea that its leadership power may change. No owner never want to handed-up their power to another. If there is any chance to happen this, chaos is the ultimate result. Why anyone want to shift their power to other? On the other hand, education system run another policy and no relation between mangement policy between business and education sector. If this statement wants to mention changing principle alongwith time, students may be affected so much because everyone has their own choice to run educational institute. It is not so easy to handle everything and an expeirenced person only keep this power. As well as a success for educational institutions rely on students result. So it is seen that this two fields are never connected for their success with power.
Now moving towards for other sectors metioned here are politics and government. Republican country has public voting system which is held after five years to elect their selected leader. Political issues are maintained by their general people if though no leader can use thier power negatively or for self-interest. That's why every leader has some fear for their wrong movement. Each and every movement of government are criticize by media and general people. There have some advantages for this revitalization system. On the other hand sometimes it may rise liabilites for any countries. Many ongoing long duration projects are stopped because new leader perhaps dislike this proposal or do not appreciate previous leader's work. Such kind of difficulty may arise for this issues.
In the aforementioned information, it is seen that only revitalization never end up for final solution of success. Success depends on many more things. Development for a country depend on not only political leader's step but also general people. Everyones cooperation brings development. Corruption, missuse of power, self-interest, faultiness in management and so on disrupte any nation's progress.
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 70
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertising 63
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 75
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'field' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'fields'.
Suggestion: fields
...t links up to success in four different field following same method that is revitaliz...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...ring specific time interval. Success is depend on many factors not a single one also i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'differed'.
Suggestion: differed
...nagement system but also everything are differ to each other. Like business are manage...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...haos is the ultimate result. Why anyone want to shift their power to other? On the o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... power negatively or for self-interest. Thats why every leader has some fear for thei...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'criticized'.
Suggestion: criticized
...ch and every movement of government are criticize by media and general people. There have...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 769, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
.... Such kind of difficulty may arise for this issues. In the aforementioned inform...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, well, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24700239808 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78878427172 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553956834532 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6124354061 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.9333333333 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9 23.4991977007 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19869692007 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534963073848 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409523655619 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133885579964 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227478519073 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 48.8420337079 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.