Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The prompt above raises a controversial issue that those in power in any fields like business, politics, education or government should step down after five years reasoning that the ladder of success is easily climbed by revitalization. People is each of the fields have, without a doubt, different thought processes in terms of achieving goals.
In business, the one in power, let’s say the CEO of the company has absolutely no reason to step down after five years. For example, Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google, has been there for more than five years and Google has not seen a downfall in terms of business. Also, to be the one in power, it takes a lot of hard work, determination and a struggle. One climbing the ladders in a certain company is also increasing his/her knowledge about the company, the way it operates and functions. A person may take, let’s say arbitrarily three to four years to get at the stage, just to step down after five years? What is the guarantee, that the one who takes over would be as good as the one that did step down?
Coming to education, the principle of an esteemed school/college, the one in power, knows how the education system works. He/she has the experience and knows the ways of how certain rules should be set up in an institution. This person may actually want the betterment of the students by providing them with various co or extra curricular activites in various fields. Though some people treat education as a business, but not all. A school/college may have one in power who may either treat it as a business or selflessly think the betterment of the students and their future. Also, the students who are getting used to the education structure in their school/college may have to deal with new rules all over again in terms of curriculum, sports, timings etc.
Politics on the other side, runs on totally different path. It is sometimes dirty or otherwise. Here, the idea of stepping down after five years may be helpful for the country. But again, a coin has two sides. For example, Manmohan Singh, was the prime minister of India for ten years, that is two terms in India. India was progressing in terms of economy, industrialization and other factors, no doubt. But, after Narendra Modi, the current prime minister of India, was selected, India caught pace and there was and is substantial growth in the country.
So sometimes it is just not that, that the current one in power is good or bad at his role. Sometimes one needs to trail and test. In fact, no one will be corrupted, but the one succeeding may just be better. Thus, revitalization through new leadership is an absolutely correct reason but the claim of stepping down in five years is not warranted.
- Which is more important for success the natural ability you are born with or hard work Explain your opinion using specific reasons and examples 81
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to wh 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, so, thus, for example, in fact, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7358490566 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71872436765 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486373165618 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0764581972 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.36 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.08 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248570550687 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648791345888 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877645503875 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143821015849 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074821435349 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.