Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claims is based.
Everything and everyone in this world is replaceable, prompt suggest that in any field business, politics, education, government, those in power should step down after five years. In my not so humble opinion, I mostly agree with the statement that those in power should step down after certain time period for following reasons.
To begin with, there will always someone better ready to take the place of those in posse’s power. It is blatant that other people will try to take possession by doing some good deeds or exposing people those who already posses that power or position. This activity somewhere bolsters to do good deeds for other people. For instance, in politics if one party is in power, then, other parties will try to undermine them by pointing their small mistakes or doing more good deeds then those in power to come in power after five years in this case people will vote those who have done good deeds for society and those who deserve it. This example illustrate that, people those who are in power now will not be in that exact position forever there will be always someone doing better work then them and deserve better than them.
Moreover, old leader old generation should be replacing by new leader and new generation. Tough old leader are good but there will be a point when new generation will have to take over that position because new problem required modern solution and its plausible that new generation will able to tackle new problems more effectively. Exemplar, in case of business if old panel is not replaced by modern panel then old panel will try to tackle every problem with old solution and old principal which will not work every time but if new panel take their position then they will come with new ideas and new strategy which may burgeons the company’s profit.
Finally, I agree with the reason that surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leader. Its blatant that new generation new leader will have more potential and more new ideas to work on as he have to prove him or her better than previous one. In this case it blatant that company, business or government will improve and have high possibility to achieve more success. For instance, in politics if new party comes in power then its blatant that that party will have to work more to prove themselves better than previous one or next time people will not vote them or they may experience debacle.
In conclusion, those in power should step down after certain period of time and new power should take its place for better development.
- Do you agree or disagree in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 63
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 62
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the south western United States This change however has had little impact 58
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College To serve the housing needs of our students Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories Buckingham s enrollment is growing and based on current tren 60
- The following appeared in a newsletter published by the Appleton school district In a recent study more than 5 000 adolescents were asked how often they ate meals with their families Almost 30 percent of the teens said they ate at least seven meals per we 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...small mistakes or doing more good deeds then those in power to come in power after f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
... and those who deserve it. This example illustrate that, people those who are in power now...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 767, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...on forever there will be always someone doing better work then them and deserve bette...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ial and more new ideas to work on as he have to prove him or her better than previou...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e them or they may experience debacle. In conclusion, those in power should ste...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...in power should step down after certain period of time and new power should take its place for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... take its place for better development.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, moreover, so, then, as to, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 447.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79865771812 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31420927406 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413870246085 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.1315405432 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236736460746 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107096579684 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908734702238 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166472522798 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699371090054 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.