Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
What source of information is unbiased, to which we can really trust: the internet, media, other people, literature, science? The author's assertion suggests, that in any case, the information might be eventually turned out to be false, and, thus, we should not trust to any piece of information. I consider the claim to be far much extreme and am inclined to disagree with the statement. My opinion is supported by arguments which i elaborate on in further paragraphs.
First of all, I concede that there are cases when previous discoveries had been refuted. For instance, the geocentric theory of the solar system. For decades this theory had been considered as an inevitable truth in different layers of society including even more intellectually oriented people until it was proven to be nonsense. However, although such examples illustrate a complete change in views and understandings of how our environment is composed through time, in the majority of cases new-developed theories and discoveries represent extensions of the previous ones. As an example, let's consider Einstein's theory of relativity. Its creation didn't change completely or refute the Newtonian mechanics. Instead, it provided a physical apparatus for mechanics in special cases - when a speed exceeds the speed of the light wave. This example shows that information is not necessarily will be turned to be false, it might instead play the role of a fundament for acquiring a new piece of information.
Furthermore, If the claim is correct, there would be no reason to fund scientific institutions or universities, no reason to read books or take an education. Therefore, the author's statement is exaggerated to a hight extant. It is obvious that a fact may be proven to be false in the future, but it is not the reason to mistrust all the information we receive.
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 50
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... other people, literature, science? The authors assertion suggests, that in any case, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...opinion is supported by arguments which i elaborate on in further paragraphs. ...
^
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...eins theory of relativity. Its creation didnt change completely or refute the Newtoni...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ks or take an education. Therefore, the authors statement is exaggerated to a hight ext...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, for instance, first of all, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 300.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14333333333 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07503395442 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606666666667 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2035921928 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.866666667 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331835538411 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933022204117 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131522762332 0.0758088955206 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235980553773 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089286572265 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.