Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
Society, by definition refers to a group of individuals involved in a social interaction in a geographical region. A group of people combined together who share various beliefs, customs and ideas form a society. From the ancient times each society is believed to have a leader or a hero who they look up to. In the modern world, these heroes or leaders may be politicians, actors, activists, etc. The claim implies that to understand the character of a society one should just inspect its heroes. This is not a righteous claim due to the following reasons.
Firstly, societies from around the world are diverse. The norms, traditions, festivities and culture differ all around the globe. Even within a country, numerous cultural differences can be seen. So, it can be rightly said that no two societies are identical. The beliefs of various societies vary. What seems to be a charm for a society may be seen as a threat to another. Distinguishable societies choose their heroes and role models based on what is seen a righteous thing in their culture. But, it’s not guaranteed that the entire society looks up to them as heroes. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the society it cannot be assumed that all the individuals of the society share the same values as their heroes.
Secondly, how can one judge an entire population on the basis of their leaders or heroes? For instance, when the president of the United States, Donald Trump was elected, the opinion differences regarding his victory made headline every other day. Not every American supported his beliefs and ideologies. Even in our daily life it’s hard to agree with someone on everything. The differences in the opinion which occur between two individuals nullify the claim of the issue.
In conclusion, considering a homogeneous society the claim of the issue is fair. But in the real world, where there are heterogeneous societies the claim doesn’t stand upright. No two individuals have the same outlook on everything especially, their role models and heroes. It’s best to assume that everyone is entitled to their own opinion and choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 33
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 61
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 66
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 33
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, as for, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04532577904 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83440750998 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543909348442 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1874920179 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.2083333333 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7083333333 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276058990407 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735291012024 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730336938718 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15301509028 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730735022566 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.