The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
The statement claim that the best way to understand the society's charactersistic is to examine the charecter of the men and women that the society follow anc choose as their heros or role model. I agree with the statement insofar as the natural tends of the human being is to imitate their heores characteristic. Also contemporary cultures of a society are biased by their role model. So it is more likely to examine the character of the society by judging the character of their role models. However, in society, different people have diverse role models and it is less likely the whole society is affected by the character of their role model as human has own judging capabilities. Sometimes they are biased but that does not affect the society.
Fiest compelling aargument in favor of my position is human has the common nature and that is they are tend to imitate the character of the person they follow. So it is more likely the character of their role models are spread the society and it can easily examine the character of the society by judging this role model. For example, if the people of society follow a politician then he consider as a hero of the society and society affect by the character of the politician. And by judging the politician, the society's character can easily be examined.
Another argument is the society contemporary culture are based on the young generation of this society. The young generation are easily be biased by their heroes. And the whole contemporary culture of this society are affected by the character of this hero that the young generation follow. For instance, if the youth of society follow some comedian then they also biased by him and try to do comedy with others and the whole society tend to be comedian as like him. So the contemporary culture of the society can easily be examined by judging this hero.
Moreover, If any person is be a scientist of doctor then the parents of the society force their child to be look like him and his character is diffused to the whole child of the society and this society can easily examine by him.
However, human has own judging capabilities and sometimes he is not affected by his hero though like him because of the zealotry. Also in society, there are different types of person live and everyone has different demand. From their different perspective different person can be role model. And the society is affected by different characters and it is not easy to examine the society culture by judging these heroes.
In conclusion, people in society tends to look like their heroes and this character is diffuse in the society and if the maximum people follow the ssingle of unitary person then it will easy to examie the society character by judging them. But the different people follow the different person then there will more likely mixed character will show that is very hard to examine. So everything is depend on the people of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- The bar chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the last year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting for the total energy from 1971 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graphs below show the total percentage of films released and the total percentage of ticket sales in 1996 and 2006 in a country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar graph below outlines literacy rates for a number of nations in 200 Write a report for a university lecture describing the information shown here 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...to imitate their heores characteristic. Also contemporary cultures of a society are ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
... the common nature and that is they are tend to imitate the character of the person ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'considers'.
Suggestion: considers
... of society follow a politician then he consider as a hero of the society and society af...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 434, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...er as a hero of the society and society affect by the character of the politician. And by...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... this hero. Moreover, If any person is be a scientist of doctor then the parents ...
^^
Line 6, column 395, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
... very hard to examine. So everything is depend on the people of the society.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2436.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7578125 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5674227439 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.31640625 0.4932671777 64% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 824.4 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.772866374 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.913043478 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2608695652 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91304347826 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394180891886 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148165568338 0.0831039109588 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132326888009 0.0758088955206 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244720558242 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10703894259 0.0667264976115 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.