Claim: The emergence of online "blogosphere" and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the US
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, the standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline.
There is no doubt that due to technological advances it has become very easy to connect many people and express our opinion openly. When such technologies were unavailable, people mainly used to rely on newspapers. Only reports used to cover news and express their opinion publicly. And whatever opinion common people have were discussed only among the friends and family etc. But social media has given a platform for everyone to say whatever they like without any bounds and this has definitely degraded the quality of political discourse. Many times rather than focusing on crucial factors people tend to discuss trivial things which are more entertaining. Mostly it is seen that rather than discussing on the national policies and the changes than new leaders can bring upon, people are inclined to know about personal lives of politicians, what type of clothes they wear, their personal affairs etc. No wonder when tool like social media has come into hands of people with lesser knowledge in politics standards of news and political topics has gone down.
- Claim: The emergence of online "blogosphere" and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the USReason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, the standards for covering news and political topics 50
- Claim: The emergence of online "blogosphere" and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the USReason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, the standards for covering news and political topics 50
- Claim: The emergence of online "blogosphere" and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the USReason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, the standards for covering news and political topics 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icly. And whatever opinion common people have were discussed only among the frien...
^^
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...nd whatever opinion common people have were discussed only among the friends and fa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 12.9106741573 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 2235.4752809 40% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 174.0 442.535393258 39% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09770114943 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 4.55969084622 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45808434016 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 215.323595506 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.67816091954 0.4932671777 137% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 704.065955056 40% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0229902967 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185103032648 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777103749859 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089180417032 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185103032648 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.