Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.
Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim AND the reason on which that claim is based.
Each one of us today tries to achieve their dreams they have thought of from the childhood. The dreams have been shared by various factors, influence from our parents, teachers and heroes. With an endeavour to achieve these dreams we work tirelessly intending to fulfil them. However, it would not be right to not to allow people some people to follow their dreams just because of the selfish characteristics.
The perception of worthy goal is a very subjective and a personal one. The definition of a worthy goal may not be the same of different persons. For a painter, a worthy goal would be try to match his capabilities to that of Leonardo di Vinci. For an actor, a worthy goal would be to try to win an oscar with his capabilities. Hence, it would be morally and ethically wrong to force someone on picking worthy goal as per another person's opinion. In addition, if a painter was forced to take up a worthy goal such as a scientist or a social activist just because of non selfish nature then it might also be possible that no significant contribution would have been made. Moreover, the lack of interest is also paramount. If someone is forced to take up goals which is out of his interest, it is very much possible that full efforts would be put in achieving this particular goal.
Moreover, another question that arises is how can one determine if one's dreams are selfish or not. Just because it does benefit a large number of people, doesn't justify the dream of someone to be classified as a selfish dream. Considering the example of Usain Bolt, a sprinter, has worked tirelessly in achieving his dream for running the 100m race the fastest. In addition, he in fact achieved the world title of the fastest sprinter in 100m race and holds a world record. This might seem to be a selfish dream because this world recognition doesn't provide any benefit to the people but solely to himself. Hence, if the athlete was forced to give up this dream, just because of its selfish nature, it would be very much inappropriate and would be termed as coercion.
Nonetheless, there might be some endeavours which target towards destruction and loss of human life. An illustration to elucidate it-a teenager might be bullied by the seniors in high school or college. There are very often cases in which the victim becomes so much humiliated and victimised, that he sets his dream to take revenge against his enemies. Moreover, there are even instances in which the victim ends up killing his bullies. This type of endeavours are necessary to be stopped, because not only they are selfish but more importantly parlous.
Thus, in a nutshell it can be concluded that it is very much difficult to classify dreams which are worthy and selfish. Moreover, it would not be appropriate to stop following from any particular dream just because they won't align with greater interests towards the mankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Mridul | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | solankis304 | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | psalasiya | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Siddhivinayak Shanbhagd | 75 | view |
- Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Reason: It is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs a 58
- Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing an 50
- Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing an 50
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most comp 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...e on picking worthy goal as per another persons opinion. In addition, if a painter was ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...that arises is how can one determine if ones dreams are selfish or not. Just because...
^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...sh or not. Just because it does benefit a large number of people, doesnt justify the dream of som...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... does benefit a large number of people, doesnt justify the dream of someone to be clas...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...sh dream because this world recognition doesnt provide any benefit to the people but s...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'as for', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.199637023593 0.240241500013 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.170598911071 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0834845735027 0.0880659088768 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0689655172414 0.0497285424764 139% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0526315789474 0.0444667217837 118% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112522686025 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0471869328494 0.0406280797675 116% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63477018361 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0417422867514 0.030933414821 135% => OK
Particles: 0.00725952813067 0.0016655270985 436% => OK
Determiners: 0.0980036297641 0.0997080785238 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0290381125227 0.0249443105267 116% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010889292196 0.0148568991511 73% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2896.0 2732.02544248 106% => OK
No of words: 503.0 452.878318584 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75745526839 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.337972166998 0.366273622748 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.256461232604 0.280924506359 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.159045725646 0.200843997647 79% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10337972167 0.132149295362 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63477018361 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 219.290929204 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475149105368 0.48968727796 97% => OK
Word variations: 55.0532904639 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.12 23.380412469 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0199944475 59.4972553346 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.84 141.124799967 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.12 23.380412469 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.674092028746 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 45.7661232604 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.2298136646 1.64882698954 75% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281261980159 0.391690518653 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.142985707933 0.123202303941 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.098798198132 0.077325440228 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.49739974632 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.111991782719 0.149214159877 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106911702331 0.161403998019 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434158535116 0.0892212321368 49% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.338479814468 0.385218514788 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0508520094877 0.0692045440612 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196239744287 0.275328986314 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287548521648 0.0653680567796 44% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.30420353982 245% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 11.0 3.66592920354 300% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.5995575221 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.