Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.
Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.
In any generation youngsters are energetic and analytic. They have capacity to change the fate of the nation. If such a power is misplaced by characteristics like selfishness, unawareness their life will be miserable. The famous leader Dr.APJ Abdul Kalam said a quote on dreams. The essence of it is dreaming is good and achieving that dream is the best goal. When young people are advised to follow their dreams as said there are some limitations to be understood. Due to their lack of knowledge or misguidance or some other reason, youth are not piking worthy goals.
When a student is asked about his/her goal in which his/her attitude or in which the goal is unequal to his/her capacity, they may not be successful. Ultimately, they must compromise their goal at some point of time. To rephrase the goal or to change it they would not have any capacity left to fulfill them. That is why forming a right goal is very much important. Every work must be analyzed both in positive and negative directions. For example a student whose height is 5.8" and keeps his goal to strike the Wimbledon, may not be practical because to be eligible for that game his height must be at least 6".
One more illustration where young people are found selfish is at their career. If a person's goal is to crack a interview which is a dream come true for him/her, uses shortcuts to gain the job, is not an appropriate goal. In this path to gain the job he/she might undergo many wrong decisions which ultimately get them into the job but the others will suffer due to them. May be they call it as intelligence but they forget that intelligence turns to selfishness if they try to hurt or they hurt others by their actions.
Therefore, to conclude youngsters must follow their dreams but must keep in mind about the pros and cons of the dream. These dreams must not degrade them but must help them to go beyond their dream. Youth always break many of impossible things. However they must not be selfish while achieving it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Mridul | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | solankis304 | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | psalasiya | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Siddhivinayak Shanbhagd | 75 | view |
- Teacher’s salary should be based on their student’s academic performance. 50
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 50
- "The most effective strategy for a company to use to maintain and increase profits over the long term is to maintain high ethical standards."Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons a 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... found selfish is at their career. If a persons goal is to crack a interview which is a...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 110, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r career. If a persons goal is to crack a interview which is a dream come true fo...
^
Line 6, column 372, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: Maybe
...but the others will suffer due to them. May be they call it as intelligence but they f...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 246, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...always break many of impossible things. However they must not be selfish while achievin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67507002801 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55208668251 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4161471108 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4761904762 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159227503107 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465700704777 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499656710365 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965709365241 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266242337277 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 48.8420337079 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.