Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
One of many governmental duties is to oversee and distribute collected funds for the overall well-being of its country. It must prioritize the most beneficial services and program. Giving major cities financial support for the purpose of preserving the nation’s cultural traditions would pull money from other programs and not necessarily address the core cause.
A major city could be failing due to many factors. Crime, economic hardship, poor leadership can all contribute to a downfall of a major city. An increase in financial support many not directly solve these problems. One example is the city of Detroit, where high crime rates hobble city development and tourism. Without a plan to address the root cause, financial support --- much like painkillers--- would only mask the problem and keep it hidden in the background where it festers until there is no choice but to amputate.
While money is being pumped into the city, it is being drained from elsewhere. Local and federal governments must redirect funds in order to provide to the city. These subsidies would be taken from governmental funds dedicated to programs like social security, education, food stamps, road work, and health care. And if the central problem is not addressed, these programs would be drained for years and potential decades.
A nation’s cultural traditions can be preserved and generated outside major cities. For many, traditions are formed from villages and neighborhood rather than the major metropolitans. Take for example a major American city: New York city. The traditions commonly found here derive from the many different backgrounds of its inhabitants. Cultures like Chinese, Italian, Korean, French and much more are brought from all around the world where it combines to become the ‘New York City” experience. Thus, New York City itself is not a requirement, but rather the homelands and areas that its inhabitants originate from.
Providing financial aid for failing major cities would drain money from other governmental programs and services. A nations cultures can be preserved and derived elsewhere.
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaint 54
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 58
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ons commonly found here derive from the many different backgrounds of its inhabitants. Culture...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'culture'.
Suggestion: culture
...mental programs and services. A nations cultures can be preserved and derived elsewhere....
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271317829457 0.240241500013 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.134366925065 0.157235817809 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.111111111111 0.0880659088768 126% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0439276485788 0.0497285424764 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0258397932817 0.0444667217837 58% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0904392764858 0.12292977631 74% => OK
Participles: 0.046511627907 0.0406280797675 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81755946593 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0232558139535 0.030933414821 75% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0852713178295 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0284237726098 0.0249443105267 114% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0077519379845 0.0148568991511 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2135.0 2732.02544248 78% => OK
No of words: 333.0 452.878318584 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.41141141141 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.387387387387 0.366273622748 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.324324324324 0.280924506359 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.24024024024 0.200843997647 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.162162162162 0.132149295362 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81755946593 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552552552553 0.48968727796 113% => OK
Word variations: 59.7250747733 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.65 23.380412469 71% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.241733314 59.4972553346 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 141.124799967 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.65 23.380412469 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.35 0.674092028746 52% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 49.0824324324 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.64882698954 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335337927675 0.391690518653 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0750282042566 0.123202303941 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0518604783722 0.077325440228 67% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.495739099098 0.547984918172 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.121667535776 0.149214159877 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117892129512 0.161403998019 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736026139405 0.0892212321368 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.273777403489 0.385218514788 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0543304343882 0.0692045440612 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200568818609 0.275328986314 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050319025255 0.0653680567796 77% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.