Finding the best way to perform teaching learning process in colleges is a matter of debate of twenty-first century. Traditional lecture based instruction was unquestionable method of teaching until the last century. Practical/demonstrative classes, group assignments are few among several methods of teaching learning process to come in limelight with With changing global scenario. To make students able to collaborate and work with peers while gaining most updated knowledge, group assignments should be a vital part of teaching learning process. This can be summarized as follow.
First and foremost, group works will prepare students to work with peers in order to get bigger goals. It is true that every job around the globe includes collaboration with their peers to complete a task. If students are not prepared for working in group since college times, they will take more time to adapt and acclimatize in order to work with their group. College group projects will substantially decrease this time gap by nourishing students with much needed experience even before reaching job market. In the competitive job market, this will certainly prove as an added benefit.
Secondly, group assignments will increase research and inference ability of students. These type of assignments will compel various students to carry on their independent studies and gather plethora of data from various sources. Later, the information will be brainstromed between group members, conflicts in information will be re-verified and summarized. Finally, information will be compiled in order to get summary followed by presentation. This vast process will involve every member of group to research and bring conclusion, making them more suitable for research related works.
The information collected and compiled by students during assignments is more recent than traditional textbooks and even than teachers notes. As the field of science and technology is ever changing and things that are true today will not necessarily be true by tomorrow. Teacher may not necessarily be updated to the changes and his knowledge may be incomplete. Books take much longer time to update. If students are compelled to perform assignments by themselves, they will certainly bring more updated knowledge compared to professor or teachers, making students and even teachers more updated to always changing knowledge.
Scholars argue that students acquire false information while doing group works and carry false information forever. However, This is not totally correct since Group works are a result of compendium of information acquired by group and not a single individual. Further, teachers are always there to correct and fact check the information and provide further guidance. In fact, this is why group assignments should replace substantial amount of traditional lecture based classes but not whole teaching learning process or teacher. However, it is a great idea to replace substantial amount of traditional lectures with group assignments to make students able to work in group and other funtions.
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 54
- The following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five 70
- The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago Furthermore there has been 59
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian a company that manufactures men s clothing Five years ago at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric we discontinued production of 78
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: with
...g learning process to come in limelight with With changing global scenario. To make stude...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 542, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...ld be a vital part of teaching learning process. This can be summarized as follow. F...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 574, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...earning process. This can be summarized as follow. First and foremost, group works wil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 585, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cess. This can be summarized as follow. First and foremost, group works will pre...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2613.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52431289641 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95356025585 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484143763214 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4886201265 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.52 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.92 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.48 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331321970553 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950582900939 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956902116024 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184260093142 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894110610688 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.