Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agr

Essay topics:

Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.

Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Most of us approximately deal with some situations in our lives that we have to decide based on our erstwhile knowledge or adapt new solutions to solve our problems. In this way, some people argue that adapting novel ideas is better than referring to experience since there is no limitation in making new decisions. As a result, our imagination is more valuable than experience. However, I mostly disagree with this idea because of two reasons.
Fist of all, using experimented solutions, helps us to improve faster. For instance, consider an apprentice who has got employed a week ago in a famous company which is fraught of professional staffs. He unexpectedly come across to a problem and as he does not adequate experience, he can not imagine the consequence of his decision. It is possible that he wants to adapt unparalleled ways to solve his problems but it is not sensible to put his position at risk. In this case, he easily can take some piece of advice from is mentor or manager, and be more responsible in doing his duties. This example illustrate that we do not need to make the same mistakes which people made before us too prove that we think in a unique way. Adapting useful experience helps us to save our time and energy in order to increase our productivity and take advantageous from being imprudent person.
Secondly, some of the consequences of our decisions, not only effect our lives but also have negative influence on our family and friend's lives. For instance, in many societies, parents, teachers and the government try to make more clear the negative effects of using drugs for teenagers and adults. However, a selfish person who denigrate the result of experiments claims that his brain and body is so strong enough to not addicted to the drugs. In many cases, he is gong to steal some money from his parents or friends to supply his required drug. Thus, he destroy his reputation and nobody is going to trust him. This example shows us that we should be careful of people who are important for us in order not to hurt them unintentionally.
Some people may argue that following other footprints may interrupt us to think critically and creatively since we are looking in the past all the time. I do not agree with this idea only under some conditions. First of all, the subject is not a putative one that approximately all people around us warn about that and secondly, we should be able to take the responsible of our decisions in a bigger scope and evaluate its effects on other lives instead of being a refractory person.
To sum up, my personal opinion is that in dealing with situations that we are not sure about the future of our actions, it is more rational to rely on experience than testing unprecedented ideas. However, If the issue is not critical which effect our lives bane-fully, I suggest trying new notions.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-04 ShreshthKapai 50 view
2023-07-23 shubham1102 50 view
2023-01-01 Vraj Parekh 50 view
2022-11-06 FelixMT 62 view
2022-11-06 FelixMT 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user f.khosh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 603, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
...sible in doing his duties. This example illustrate that we do not need to make the same mi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 688, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to prove'?
Suggestion: to prove
...me mistakes which people made before us too prove that we think in a unique way. Adapting...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 712, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a unique way" with adverb for "unique"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... made before us too prove that we think in a unique way. Adapting useful experience helps us to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...rom being imprudent person. Secondly, some of the consequences of our decisions, not only...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...consequences of our decisions, not only effect our lives but also have negative influe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'destroys'.
Suggestion: destroys
...s to supply his required drug. Thus, he destroy his reputation and nobody is going to t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ng a refractory person. To sum up, my personal opinion is that in dealing with situations that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, as a result, first of all, in many cases, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 33.0505617978 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2361.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73146292585 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73315250397 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51503006012 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4397896686 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.318181818 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6818181818 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120767665505 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041272117099 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432486046288 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073427432878 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284140443455 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.