Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.
Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.
The author of this issue claims that imagination is a more valuable asset then experience. Even though such a perspective may be reasonable for reason that without the constraints of established habits and attitudes, people are free to imagine what is possible, when we delve deeper, we can find other situations which could refute this perspective. Therefore, such a point of view is effective under some specific circumstance, however, I disagree with it for this point of view is not suitable for most of the situations.
To start with, I concede the reason that the autor provided is somewhat tenable for the situation that a lot of great inventions are come from imagination. We can see the invention of the plane is based on the imagination. People could never think they can fry in the sky with their own experience. From my perspective, however, a main problem involved in the author' claim is that a large number of imagination can't bring the positive outcomes in real world. We can see that compare to people's experience, imagination based on nothing. It's a commen case that for invention which just based on imagination can never come true since there is no actually factors to support it, and then it can't bring any real application. Under this situation, the validity of author's claim will be significant weakened.
The further reason is that a new idea based on the established habits and attitudes are more likely to be accepted by people than the idea full of imagination. We know that, normally, people would like to understand and support things that they are familiar with, so they are more likely to accept the idea based on their own experience. Take me as an example, I more like to accept the idea that I am familiar with. Given this circumstance, the author's claim will be untenable.
To sum up, there are, as I have presented before, two main reasons that I can't agree with the author's claim. Before drawing any conclusion, the author should consider more potential factors and possible situations which could impair his/her stands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | ShreshthKapai | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | shubham1102 | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-01 | Vraj Parekh | 50 | view |
| 2022-11-06 | FelixMT | 62 | view |
| 2022-11-06 | FelixMT | 50 | view |
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 62
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 62
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 50
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 62
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...at imagination is a more valuable asset then experience. Even though such a perspect...
^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...em involved in the author claim is that a large number of imagination cant bring the positive out...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...m is that a large number of imagination cant bring the positive outcomes in real wor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
... real world. We can see that compare to peoples experience, imagination based on nothin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...perience, imagination based on nothing. Its a commen case that for invention which ...
^^^
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ally factors to support it, and then it cant bring any real application. Under this ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ally factors to support it, and then it cant bring any real application. Under this ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...esented before, two main reasons that I cant agree with the authors claim. Before dr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90857142857 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7567860613 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511428571429 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4952692901 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227368167733 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750783778052 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753338631615 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132891859031 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620544994257 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.