Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
No person who regularly or even less frequently tries to keep themselves aware of the world history and current affairs would deny the mentioned claim along with the given reason. The reason in itself is quite plausible. Several instances have been evidences to how difficult it has become in today’s world to crown a deserving person the mantle of a new generation hero. The reason being, the media.
People associated with the press or rather the common media, go to such deeper extents to extract personal information about trending personalities in order to gain more viewers. Some even spark gossips or forge information in order to gain publicity. History is evident how the media around the world have intentionally or unintentionally defamed several freedom fighters, revolutionary techies, historical geniuses and even established organisations.
Considering the case with Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, these men always strived to achieve better in the field of technology and provide the world with best of their knowledge. Although people’s obsession with them, brought them to media’s attention and their feud which was mostly personal was brought to the public’s attention causing years of mental stress and arousal of hate in the general public for both men. Political heroes such as Barack Obama was heavily criticised for his decisions he made in the oval office, which over-weighed his in-numerous positive works as the president of the USA.
Ostensible information was and is still often circulated about how Isaac Newton pirated the scientific work of other not well-known scientist from his era. Or how NASA faked the moon landing just to make the US appear ahead of the USSR in the cold war. Similarly, the Hacker group which goes by the name anonymous has been criticised several times for the unauthorised actions they have taken against the unjust governments all around the globe.
Although media scrutiny has its downsides, it provides the person in question with many supporters, people who think alike and have a similar say in a particular matter. The media may or may not display both sides of the coin of a situation, it’s always up to the person sitting on the other side of the screen to decide who to trust and who should the lend their support to.
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 83
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep t 97
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will in 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ental stress and arousal of hate in the general public for both men. Political heroes such as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 350, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n to decide who to trust and who should the lend their support to.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, similarly, so, still, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11140583554 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71183287267 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604774535809 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1662216151 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.466666667 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.93333333333 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117611651216 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407412327646 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033654566688 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621725622196 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251666193323 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.