Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In today’s world there are many humans with good intention and many with bad intention, so allowing society to choose person identity would be highly inappropriate. The prompt recommends that it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this suggestion and argue against it, by some reasons along with the given stated reason which says: the repudiation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
To begin, the reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. To simplify one should never fully get based on media for their reputation, as this may lead disadvantageous to them. Let’s understand by an example- today use of social media very common so let’s take it. Suppose a one person X who is very smart and intellectual he or she might not be as active as person Y who is not very smart compared to X. And Y continues to update every small achievement he/she has got on social media and Y doesn’t puts any updates on social media, than by assuming this scenario person X is quite smart than person Y, whereas in real there is contradictory situation. So assuming reputation through internet not only brings wrong assumption but it may also inappropriate people to high success and lead good people to latent. So choosing media for achieving reputation will eventually be diminished.
Further, if person let’s society decides his or her reputation it may harshly impact his/her life. Today our surrounding are very unpredictable sometimes one who is very kind, at next moment same person becomes cunning within some time interval. Similarly our surrounding are also with same scenario. For instance, person X who might have scored less than 70 percent in secondary education, and when his neighbour comes into secondary education, person X says that secondary education result is very important one should always score minimum of 85 percent otherwise he/she does not comes under average student and further continues to speak this kind of stuff even though he has not achieved this scenario. This would lead to kind of depression to other one. So listening and following society would become not only negative but even can get wrong assumptions. So instead of listening to society believing in factual parameters is way preferred to avoid negative impacts in one’s life. Therefore choosing society to decide reputation would might lead to harmful scenario instead of good one.
However some argue that media or society helps to promote you by inspiring your situation through variety of circumstances. But it is possible if one takes as a positive side of scenario and changes of this area highly less. So allowing media or society to decide your reputation is not appropriate.
- Reading Critics say that current voting systems used in the United States are inefficient and often lead to the inaccurate counting of votes Miscounts can be especially damaging if an election is closely contested Those critics would like the traditional 73
- The vice president of human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company s president In an effort to improve our employees productivity we should implement electronic monitoring of employees Internet use from their wor 58
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 75
- professor appearance of television 80
- Passage Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of alt 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[4]
Message: The verb 'doesn't' requires base form of this verb: 'put'
Suggestion: put
...e has got on social media and Y doesn’t puts any updates on social media, than by as...
^^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...esn’t puts any updates on social media, than by assuming this scenario person X is q...
^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: LETS_LET[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lets' or 'let'?
Suggestion: lets; let
...y be diminished. Further, if person let’s society decides his or her reputation i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...omes cunning within some time interval. Similarly our surrounding are also with same scen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 583, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'come'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: come
...of 85 percent otherwise he/she does not comes under average student and further conti...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 583, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'come'
Suggestion: come
...of 85 percent otherwise he/she does not comes under average student and further conti...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 987, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...o avoid negative impacts in one’s life. Therefore choosing society to decide reputation w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...armful scenario instead of good one. However some argue that media or society helps ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, similarly, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in fact, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2378.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03813559322 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77394189967 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510593220339 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.628716897 60.3974514979 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.238095238 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4761904762 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244199210248 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828521528527 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102941310585 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166340225768 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102749483455 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.