The claim states that the past knowledge cannot support today decisions because we cannot make connection between them until we have some distance from both. I strongly disagree with this claim for many reasons which will be discussed in the following essay.
First, the things that happened in the past can happen again in the similar situations. For example, Thai government has tried to solve the violent situations caused by terrorists in the southern region of Thailand by using the army force to fight with those terrorists for many decades. Although, many terrorists were killed, the fighting caused more people in the region to be angry and more people joined the terrorist group. Then, Thai government changed the strategy by using the non-violent methods instead. Many teachers and social activists were sent to the area to educate the local people and improved the society in many ways. This method can dramatically reduce the violence in the region. If the government did not make the connections between the current situations and their past actions and changed the strategy, more lives would be lost without any better outcome.
Second, the knowledge from the past can shorten the time for solving new problems. For instance, when I worked as a process engineer in a polymer production plant, the plant had a serious problem in product quality control due to the impurities in the feed stream. I studied a lot of similar problems of other plants form books and websites and found that one of them solved this problem by installing a unit to separate the impurities from the feed stream. I applied this method to my plant and the problem can be solved in a short time. It might take several years for trial-and-error methods if I did not make the connection between the past problem of another plant and the problem of my plant.
Someone may argue that it is difficult to make a connection between the past and present until we have some distance from both. This statement is absolutely not true. From the above examples in the previous paragraphs, it can be proved that, if we have proper example situations in the past and correctly relate them to the present situations, we can apply them and solve the present situations easily.
All in all, I believe that it is not difficult to connect between the situations in the past and the present. Therefore, the past knowledge can help people to make the correct decision in the present.
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre 57
- "Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain 50
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 70
- It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are generated and preserved.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 70
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 50
Essay evaluation report
What we want to argue now is:
'Knowing about the past can help people to make important decisions today. because We are able to make connections between current events and past events.'
We may consider TLPE to make connections between current events and past events:
T means Time: for example, economy crisis happened 100 years ago may happen again if the conditions now like that of the past.
L means Location: If something (a scandal for example) can happen in one country, it can happen in another country too.
P means People: Human's nature may be similar.
E means Event: Internet may help the connections. for example, big data, artificial intelligence....
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 417 350
No. of Characters: 1994 1500
No. of Different Words: 194 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.519 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.782 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.491 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 145 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 113 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.947 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.953 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.526 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.335 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.554 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.124 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 700, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther plant and the problem of my plant. Someone may argue that it is difficult t...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'for example', 'for instance']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236725663717 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.141592920354 0.157235817809 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0951327433628 0.0880659088768 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.033185840708 0.0497285424764 67% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0486725663717 0.0444667217837 109% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128318584071 0.12292977631 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0265486725664 0.0406280797675 65% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.55018354242 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0265486725664 0.030933414821 86% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.150442477876 0.0997080785238 151% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0287610619469 0.0249443105267 115% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00663716814159 0.0148568991511 45% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2457.0 2732.02544248 90% => OK
No of words: 417.0 452.878318584 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89208633094 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.359712230216 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.285371702638 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.163069544365 0.200843997647 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103117505995 0.132149295362 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55018354242 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 219.290929204 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474820143885 0.48968727796 97% => OK
Word variations: 51.8264403172 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.9473684211 23.380412469 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7668970902 59.4972553346 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.315789474 141.124799967 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9473684211 23.380412469 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.473684210526 0.674092028746 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 50.4845386848 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.75247524752 1.64882698954 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416000581834 0.391690518653 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132098356762 0.123202303941 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0874343754597 0.077325440228 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.626099183339 0.547984918172 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14640890272 0.149214159877 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189051238554 0.161403998019 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971249952919 0.0892212321368 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.446660079105 0.385218514788 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.108801925194 0.0692045440612 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3153996291 0.275328986314 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479892190127 0.0653680567796 73% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.30420353982 245% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 7.22455752212 28% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 11.0 3.66592920354 300% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.