Claim: Major Policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better and perspective than do members of general public.
In any democratic country, policies are enacted in law if and only if the members of parliament have favoured in majority to do so. Policies are made to maintain various aspects like law and order, maintain security, preserve wildlife and many more. Whenever, a law or policy is made it should always favour to general public without discriminating on the basis of caste or religion. Policies which ensure the development of country, raise standard of living or citizens, eliminate poverty and make sure environment is safe will always be supported by citizens while in contrast the policies like encouraging discrimination on caste will be discouraged. Policy maker are mostly the citizens of respective country and the knowledge about policy making is not learned but earned by experience.
Sometimes, government creates a policy which favours citizens like European Union's Law of Data Protection which prevents foreign companies to send European Union citizens data in any foreign country. This law enforce to keep citizens data on European soil only just to make sure safety and privacy of citizens.
There are numerous other example like above mention one of same kind is Saudi Arabia's removal of law which restricts women from driving, going to movie theatre and roaming alone in public. This law was acting as barrier between women and their freedom and it was scrapped just for good future. Now, women can do anything which they want publicly just to encourage women on becoming independent and contributing their knowledge in future of country. Some laws or policies are not obsolete and need to be modified according to requirement or scrapped.
While in some cases the policies are created without taking people's consent into consideration just like India which went ahead on made a policy to eliminate union of traders for crops. The members of parliament didn't took people consent into consideration enforced on people. After, people got to know about about they furiously acted against it to make sure the law is rescind in upcoming days.
Laws or policies are needed to be made by politicians and other government experts but only after having discussion with the general public's representative on local level. Eventually the politicians and government experts were ordinary citizens before having the rank in government. If a person is not knowledgeable it doesn't mean that his/her view don't matter. I do partially agree with claim and reason due to above mentioned reasons and analysis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-14 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
- Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus 50
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government industry or other fields must be highly competitive Others people claim that in order to be successful a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others 83
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view 50
- The greatness of the individual s can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries 79
- In any fields business politics education government those in power should be required to step down after five years 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...licy is made it should always favour to general public without discriminating on the basis of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...oreign companies to send European Union citizens data in any foreign country. This law e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...rs for crops. The members of parliament didnt took people consent into consideration ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... into consideration enforced on people. After, people got to know about about they fu...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: about
...ed on people. After, people got to know about about they furiously acted against it to make...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 371, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'rescinded'.
Suggestion: rescinded
...cted against it to make sure the law is rescind in upcoming days. Laws or policies are...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s before having the rank in government. If a person is not knowledgeable it doesnt...
^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nt. If a person is not knowledgeable it doesnt mean that his/her view dont matter. I d...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...geable it doesnt mean that his/her view dont matter. I do partially agree with claim...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in contrast, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19259259259 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73428223573 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540740740741 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4258355387 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.833333333 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228985408942 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748681605308 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846003474051 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12800624963 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121861655251 0.0667264976115 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.