Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning, this statement could be agreed to some extent but need not always be true. Also, it seems to be partly incorrect to conclude from this statement that, One can usually learn much more from people whose views he share than from those whose views contradict his own.
First of all, the statement seems to be incorrect that One can usually learn much more from people whose views he share than from those whose views contradict his own. As, Contradictions sometimes teach the indivisual where he has to imrove. Thus, listening to the views of people which contradict his own is very important. For instance Political parties share a wide range of conflicting ideas and views over a particular point. But, if these conflicting ideas from opponent parties are thought rationally by the ruling parties, help them to understand better where they have to improve. Thus, one could learn much more from those whose views contradict his own.
Secondly the reason that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning seems to be partly incorrect, as there are times when we disagree from another's opinion. The sress developed due the disagreement may create a will inside both the parties in order to prove their view point to be correct which may lead to the evolution of new idea. For example Galileo Galiele who invented Radio, was contradicted by many scientists that, the radio waves travel in straight line and thus due to Earth's curvature could not be transmitted from one place to another. But, he had confidence over his research and proved his thought to others by introducing Inosphere present in the atmosphere which reflects the straight travelling radio waves and thus helps radio transmission of waves. If Galileo would have agreed to other scientist's opinions, the world today would have been unknown of the great invention for many years. Thus, disagreement may cause stress, but not always inhibit learning.
However, sometimes disagreement leads to conflicts which cause more and more complextions in the matter instead, people sharing same views could function better and help each other in improving the flaws in the similar manner what the other person desires. For instance, In a cricket team there are 11 players, there might be chances that all of them share different opinions and might be contradictory ones. Ultimately, the final desicion is to be made by the team captain which all have to follow. As in the field disagreement has no place and lead to stess and ultimately the team will lose. As it is said, "It is not the best team who wins, It is the team which plays best." Thus, at times people with similar opinions would funnction better and help each other prosper as disagreement may lead to stess and inhibit learning.
Thus, the claim that one can usually learn much more from people whose views he share than from those whose views contradict his own seems to be depending on circumstances. Also the reason to the claim that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning appears to be not always true.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-02 | kristen_vo | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | RIYA MODI | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Mateo Chen | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | okazaki11 | 62 | view |
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 50
- To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area but that growth has resulted mainly from the people moving h 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'shares'.
Suggestion: shares
...rn much more from people whose views he share than from those whose views contradict ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'shares'.
Suggestion: shares
...rn much more from people whose views he share than from those whose views contradict ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...m those whose views contradict his own. As, Contradictions sometimes teach the ind...
^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ele who invented Radio, was contradicted by many scientists that, the radio waves...
^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had agreed'?
Suggestion: had agreed
...radio transmission of waves. If Galileo would have agreed to other scientists opinions, the world...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'shares'.
Suggestion: shares
...rn much more from people whose views he share than from those whose views contradict ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...whose views contradict his own seems to be depending on circumstances. Also the reason to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...seems to be depending on circumstances. Also the reason to the claim that disagreeme...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2586.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 519.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98265895954 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56037104112 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435452793834 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 770.4 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8761994043 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.492177278535 0.243740707755 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168311056766 0.0831039109588 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191354522356 0.0758088955206 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363648851153 0.150359130593 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20869171683 0.0667264976115 313% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.