Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
In life, it is common for people to have different perspectives towards an event. Some
people declares that people would learn much more from people whose views are the same rather than contradicted views, and the reason is that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. However, I disagree with the claim and the reason since I believe that different points of view generate a positive influence to learn more, and disagreement does not really cause stress which inhibits learning.
First of all, people perfer to accept the view that are similar to ours and this could encourage us learning more things. Since being recognized by others can bring us honors, confidence, and enthusiasm. However, people cannot realize mistakes while they stay together with whose views are the same, and they would stay in a comfort zone that cause a stasis there. Therefore, agreement can inhibit learning.
In addition, although it is comfortable for people to share the same views, it does not
represent that people would learn much more from people whose views they share since the same views might cause everything stops at that point. If people have different views for an event, they would discuss to get a result. Through the discussion, people would learn much more because the discussion is a process for people to consider different aspects of an event, which makes them expand thoughts, and they might realize something they do not notice before. For example,during a debate, two side both do them best to find opponent's mistake by contradicted views, through this catfight, people can find depth content in the topic and learning more from it.
Admittedly, it is true that disagreement can cause stress for people whose views are different from others, and it might cause a conflict while disagree each other. However, disagreement does not exactly inhibit learning, instead it is a way to accelerate learning. Since each individual have different personality and lifestyles, basically, it is impossible that we only learn from people we share the same views, and it delays improvement of ideas and cannot go beyond them. Because we challenge ideas, we are able to discover and learn important things. We should think reasonably and accept the differences.
In general, people would learn more from the one whose views contradict our own than from those whose views we share since contradicted perspectives play an important role for people to consider different views, therefore it promotes learning, instead of cause stress and inhibit
learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-02 | kristen_vo | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | RIYA MODI | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Mateo Chen | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | okazaki11 | 62 | view |
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 54
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City s local newspaper In our region of Trillura the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend the city run public schools comes from taxes that each city government collect 60
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position. Every 66
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 66
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rent perspectives towards an event. Some people declares that people would learn ...
^^^
Line 6, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple to share the same views, it does not represent that people would learn much m...
^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'discuss getting'.
Suggestion: discuss getting
...ifferent views for an event, they would discuss to get a result. Through the discussion, peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 474, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , during
...g they do not notice before. For example,during a debate, two side both do them best to...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 253, Rule ID: OF_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of course' (=naturally)?
Suggestion: of course
...therefore it promotes learning, instead of cause stress and inhibit learning.
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing, instead of cause stress and inhibit learning.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in general, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2160.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20481927711 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61784135066 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433734939759 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8294210294 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.058823529 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4117647059 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.537464653836 0.243740707755 221% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184590140675 0.0831039109588 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139471697576 0.0758088955206 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282357249128 0.150359130593 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181334477679 0.0667264976115 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.