College students should be encouraged to pursuit subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs
Interest is vital for the success of any college student to study in any filed, whether their goal of study is to get a job. However, finding a job is not so much important for all students. For those students who have a wealthy family background, I think that proposal will not benefit in their conditions. I think that should students be encouraged to pursuit subjects that interest them rather than those courses that can help them find a job needs to be considered and discussed in different situation.
It is argued that, in order to find a job, student who has a poor family background and heavy economic pressure should choose those majors what can help him/her find a job easily instead of choosing those majors he/she has interests in. Education is often a huge expense especially for those poor families. This situation means that student who doesn’t have a wealthy family background needs to repay his families even give support in money to his/her family as soon as possible. Today’s society is so competitive, it is important for students to grasp a skill to survive. For example, a student who has interest in art had better chooses other majors can help him/her find a job easily. In most situation, if a student wants to make some achievements in art and earn enough money to feed himself, it may need a long time to carry out the precipitation of art and build some prestige in the field. This process would require a great deal of wealth, not to mention his family cannot give him financial support but need his help. The economic base determines the superstructure. Students in this situation should obviously choose their major to find a job.
It is argued that those students who have wealthy family backgrounds should choose their majors according to their interests. Interest to a student is the best teacher can raise him to keep studying in certain filed. For those students who do not worry about how to find jobs and give financial support to their family, choosing a major they have interests in can motivate them to learn as much as possible. If a graduate engages in an occupation he is interested in after graduate, he tends to be full of ambition and enthusiasm, with a favorable occupation morality.
One might disagree with me and argue that "Don't children from poor families have the right to pursue their own interests?". I think they can find a stable job and get out of poverty before they pursue what they like. Learning is a lifelong process, and if one does not have to worry about making a living and has the extra money to support one's interests, it will be helpful to develop one's amateur interests.
In conclusion, as these examples aptly demonstrate, according to different circumstances, students with good family conditions had better choose the major they are interested in, while students with poor family conditions had better choose the major that is easier to find a job first.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Don't
...t disagree with me and argue that 'Dont children from poor families have the ri...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2452.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83629191321 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68639632516 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4516765286 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 757.8 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5643901272 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.761904762 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90476190476 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240795606828 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769205968363 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099458174708 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146948066587 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104287921035 0.0667264976115 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.