Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Communication is very integral part for the success of any organisation. The policy dictates that a routine monitoring for all employee e-mail correspondence will help reduce waste of resources such as time and system capacity, and also protect company from lawsuits. I agree with this policy's stance. However, the implementation of this policy should only be restricted to official e-mail ids and not personal e-mail ids.
When a employee joins any organisation, a disciplined work ethic is expected of him. The employee is expected to carry out his official duties during his office hours. But it is observed that some employees don't focus on their work and tend to cause delay in completion of projects. One of the many reasons for this is the employee is doing some other work not related to office during his work hours. This decision that the company management should routinely monitor all employee e-mail correspondence will definitely help catch hold of people who waste their time on non-work related activities. This decision will help curb the time lost in mailing unimportant or silly things. For example, an employee who sends funny pictures to co-workers can be identified and warned for not repeating this mistake. Thus, it will prove to be a warning for other employees as well. Consequently, all employees will refrain from this activity and collectively save a lot of time for the organisation thus improving it's efficiency.
Secondly, in any organisation, conflicts are sure to arise due to difference in opinions between co-workers or workers between different organisations. It is mandatory for all employee that represents their organisation to communicate with other workers through their official e-mail ids. Thus in case a feud breaks out between co-workers or one tries to supply wrong information to clients for his personal gains can be kept on check. In presence of this monitoring, wrong actions can apprehended before it escalates into a bigger issue thus avoiding loss of resources to the organisation.
Thus, It be can be understood how important this policy will play a role in improving the overall welfare of the organisation and its employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-25 | ribhunirek | 79 | view |
- ISSUE TOPIC An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor s record of treating similarly afflicted patients Through gaining such access the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical conditio 70
- Pets should be treated like family members. Do you agree or disagree with this statement. Give reasons to support your opinion 80
- "Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as 83
- If you could meet a famous entertainer or athlete, who would that be, and why? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 90
- When famous people such as actors, athletes and rock stars give their opinions, many people listen. Do you think we should pay attention to these opinions? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 6, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ds and not personal e-mail ids. When a employee joins any organisation, a disc...
^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... But it is observed that some employees dont focus on their work and tend to cause d...
^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...kers through their official e-mail ids. Thus in case a feud breaks out between co-wo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ources to the organisation. Thus, It be can be understood how important this po...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 352.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22443181818 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98207102716 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514204545455 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7232336248 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.166666667 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231842811663 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784602010802 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131878961322 0.0758088955206 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142189498686 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12799921482 0.0667264976115 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.