A employee who excel at the entry level should be bolstered with support over the job which he/she is best at. Doing so will not only help them to focus on the task that they are interested in, but also will reinforce their skill at that particular area of interest which they may excel at. Further, it will provide company with the benefit over a long term of period. Without placing those employee at the correct position, it could bring detrimental effect to the compation.
It is crucial to place employees those who is great at particular area over the field of their interest. Having those employees at the right position, for those who have illustrated the interest, will cultivate their full interest at the task and incubate them to put out maxium effort when the job becomes demanding. For example, science majored and non-science majored student both attends to advanced level science course, learning esoteric knowledge about cell structure. The non-science major student would input effort in learning but over the peak efficiency, he would give up on the chanllenging material. On the other hand, science major student would spend more time in doing research to bite down small part of material, then return to try to understand the material at whole. In this scenario, we can see that those who are truely interested at particular field would have the tenacity to engage over long term chanllenge where as people without interest would simply not excel at the difficult task at hand. Same applies to employee working in company.
Secondly, those who do not excel at particular field not only would not have the tenacity to complete challenging task, but they would also needs more time to be trained over which field that they are assigned to. They simply will lacks the devotion to complete the task if they are not interested in it. One who truely lacks the interest will spend less personal time in investing to those material compare one who favors it. Also, randomly assigning employee who might have potential at other field could potentially undermine their true capacity.
Lastly, as mentioned above, one have no intention over a particular test will most likely give up upon facing difficult situation. Perhaps, they would also require more resource to be trained and takes more time over particular task. For example, if one who lothe the position that they are at, they would devote less focus on the task, thus, the progress of given task would be prolonged indefinitly. So, having those factors would be harmful to the benefit of company as a whole.
In conclusion, the company should bolster callow employee who show particular interest with support and focused education to incubate their skill and ability. Not focusing in such field would damage the company ober the long run because employee who lacks the interest would require more resource to be trained, takes long period of time to complete the task, and might give up during progression of training. Moreover, company who do not train employees those in their favored area is wasting the potential and company resourse.
- The following appeared in a newsletter of a social organization: "Since membership in our organization has been declining for the past year, we need to think of new ways to attract members. We need to advertise for our organization in local magazines, as 59
- A company should identify those employees who excel at entry level positions and place an emphasis on their training and professional development will increase employees' personal fulfillment and enable them to serve the company to the best of their abili 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
A employee who excel at the entry level s...
^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this employee' or 'those employees'?
Suggestion: this employee; those employees
... a long term of period. Without placing those employee at the correct position, it could bring...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 829, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...In this scenario, we can see that those who are truely interested at particular field w...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 935, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ity to engage over long term chanllenge where as people without interest would simply no...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'need'
Suggestion: need
...e challenging task, but they would also needs more time to be trained over which fiel...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lack'
Suggestion: lack
... they are assigned to. They simply will lacks the devotion to complete the task if th...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...more resource to be trained, takes long period of time to complete the task, and might give up...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2600.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 521.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99040307102 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44327332704 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437619961612 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 806.4 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3964740786 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.181818182 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6818181818 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31818181818 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271369211907 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103393291611 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798685098296 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185770635156 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792211554538 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.