Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
There has been a long debate between intellectuals, regarding the issue of whether creativity is the only factor that plays a role in innovation. This topic analyzes a similar controversial topic of whether intelligence is solely based on creativity or not. Apart from a few concessions, I strongly disapprove of this suggestion of considering creativity as the single most important factor in defining intelligence for two reasons.
Firstly, the term "creativity" is a very vague term. As of yet, there has been no concise definition for this term. What does it mean? Does it mean the ability to find new solutions? Does it mean to have a different outlook? While some argue that creativity means having a different outlook - also known as "thinking outside the box" -, others argue that creativity is the ability to form new ideas based on previous knowledge. However, both of these definitions fail to provide a clear meaning of the word "creativity". Thus, we cannot use creativity as a measure of intelligence.
Furthermore, there are many other factors apart from creativity that should be used as a measure of intelligence - such as critical thinking, ability to recognize patterns, etc. While creativity plays a vital role in an invention, it also needs to be supplemented with other faculties of intelligence and technical knowledge of respective field. While creativity could only give a breakthrough through a problem, it alone is not sufficient for developing a solution. For instance, Albert Einstein was famous for his thought experiments - using imagination to form various hypothesis regarding physics. This was his creative ability, which allowed him to find solutions to complex problems by mere visualization. However, he also needed to supplement it with other technical knowledge of physics and mathematics to further develop a solution found by creative visualization. As such, creativity is incapable of representing intelligence by itself.
In some situations however, creativity plays the most important role in an endeavor. It gives the person an epiphany. In complex scientific problems, sometimes creativity is the only way out - technical knowledge falls short of deriving a solution. Whether creativity be considered the most important factor or not is a double edged sword. Still, it cannot be the single most important factor, as many other factors play role in intelligence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 62 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | Abraham04 | 58 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: AS_OF_YET[1]
Message: Use simply 'yet' or 'as yet'.
Suggestion: Yet; As yet
...;creativity' is a very vague term. As of yet, there has been no concise definition f...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, so, still, thus, while, apart from, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50928381963 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40905346307 2.79657885939 122% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53050397878 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8923026108 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3043478261 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3913043478 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30434782609 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16042773381 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480351352839 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452820648022 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964325090912 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480373771637 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.