Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Critical examination of an work and its judgment is not a trivial task. It involves high level of responsibality and analysation. It is usually seen that even layman people also try to give there openions ase there own judgnment but those can not be considered as a referance point because of lack of knowledge and bigotness involved. I believe that critical judgment of any work should have little value unless it comes from someone who is expert in that field.
As we know that a expert is known as a virtuoso because he has a high level of knowledge in veritable field and also he is experienced to such an extent that he can be considered as an authentic identity. And critical judgement of any work should be considered by such people only because they are able to see big picture involved in that work. Usually normal people are not that much aware and mature to consider the work in an egalitarian way. They usually get biased while judging it accordind to there own convenience and if a work is judged according to this partisian mentality, then it can not be considered as a right judgment. Critical judgment should be unbiased and involve right points on the basis of which judging is done.
For example there are many important decisions involved of government which are supported by the big scholars and buerocrats but are not that much apperitiated by the public because people are nt able to see the big picture involved in that decision. Even in technology for example compairision of Apple and Android, People usually extol the freeness provided by android and love the easy shairing and other features and critize Apple IOS for its stringent policies because they re not that much aware and are ot able to see big picture. They dont understand that how much vulnerable android mobiles are becoming due to this freeness and ths is leading to waxing of syber crime. They just see android according to there convenience and give there judgement.
In the end i'll say that views of normal people should also be considered because they are the consumers and the one who are getting affected by the work and there view should be refered while improvisation but yes the critical judgement of an expert should be considered vital cause not every layman can be rational while judging a work and so there judgement should be given little value compaired to expert.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Critical examination of an work and its judgment is not a trivial ...
^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...ple also try to give there openions ase there own judgnment but those can not be consider...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...re openions ase there own judgnment but those can not be considered as a referance point ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...expert in that field. As we know that a expert is known as a virtuoso because h...
^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le are not that much aware and mature to consider the work in an egalitarian way....
^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an egalitarian way" with adverb for "egalitarian"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... aware and mature to consider the work in an egalitarian way. They usually get biased while judging ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...et biased while judging it accordind to there own convenience and if a work is judged acc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd are ot able to see big picture. They dont understand that how much vulnerable and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76941747573 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62074786111 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444174757282 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.1163251145 60.3974514979 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.357142857 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258608635919 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108152633202 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181558556133 0.0758088955206 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18718470604 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155139530443 0.0667264976115 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.