Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Only experts of any particular field are considered reliable for reviewing work in any given field. The judgment done by callow arbiters gets very minuscule amount of recognition. The assertion that valueable inputs can only be provided by experts stands true for several reasons.
Firstly, only experts have insights on nuance of the work. It is through their dedication to the field, that they get well acquainted with nitty gritty's of an outstanding accomplishment. Take for an example, on release of any movie, a plethora of criticism can be observed from audience, but only the person with profound knowledge of acting, scripts and direction are hired by media and newspapers for reviews.
Which brings us to our second point that knowledge is very important to crtiticize someone's work, without having profound knowledge it is impossible to provide reliable and sensible inputs while judging. Knowledge gives experts and upper hand to novice. Additionally, experience in the field also matters, experienced people know the assidiousness required to complete any specific work. Only a dexterous painter can recognize the effort that was put into capturing an emotion in the painting.
However, one can challege that every expert was once an amateur and it is only through the chances given to them that they made this far. It is true, even the work of citiques gets citicized. For becoming a renowned critique one has to bear both the boons and bane of the field, which is considered at the bottom of food chain in any industry. Furthermore, beginner are said to have more imaginative approach than experts. This imagination and creativity is what amateurs bring with them and that is what gets them oppotunitys to make their contributions, and gain credibility.
Conclusively, on basis of elaborations given above we can say that imagination and creativity has its own importance but it is the experience and knwoledge which steals the show. Therefore, judgement received form an expert of field always gains more importance than the one given by an amateur.
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res 66
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- Today, more and more students are deciding to move a different country for highier studies.Do you thinkthat the benefits of this outweigh the problems. 73
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most comp 70
- Some people think that having a set retirement age (e.g 65 years) for everybody, regardless of occupation, is unfair. They believe that certain workers deserve to retire and receive a pension at an earlier age.Do you agree or disagree?Which types of worke 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, as to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7969224158 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5525 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5307425258 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416160349351 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113754588556 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142997818993 0.0758088955206 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220189805567 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156160616059 0.0667264976115 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.