It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most comp

Essay topics:

It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

It is absolutely deniable that regarding any living man or woman as a hero is no longer possible for the contemporary society. Several times society has praised those who have out performed the circumstances and have achieved an act of heroism. On the other hand few factors exist that might undermine the grace of these heroes but that does not prove the short comings of society to recognize them. Major fields like Military, Sports, Education and Social work can be observed
for several such instances.

To begin with, in Military several medals are awarded to soldiers and war heroes who have shown an outstanding courage or sage during convoluted situations that pose danger to any nations security. These soldiers once declared hero always remain hero for military as well as civil adherents. These adherents idealize them, in all ways possible from daily exercise routine to diet to principles believed by heroes are adopted by their fans. There is no doubt that any nation would fail to regard its soldiers living or martyred as heroes. While, the circumstances of social workers are different than soldiers, they are not less difficult.
Activists, on the other hand, work for the improvement of society on principles of equality and liberty. From child education to world peace every activist who has ever contributed in driving a major change in the society has got the deserved recognition and accolades. Two such examples are Mother Teresa and Malala Yousafzai, both received a Nobel in the time of their life when there was much more to do on their task list. These two women have empowered and kindled a new wave of social activists especially females in the current society. And society has embraced what these women have done. But when compared to field of sports the situation is bit more complex.
In Sports, in addition to the support to statement, the media coverage and criticism are almost immediate to any player. One moment every fan will be willing to die for you, lose an important match, and situation gets reversed. But, time has always proved the mettle of top players from any sport. Be it football or cricket or any sport. While some players' fame and recognition has been evanescent, others have became legends. We have several examples like Lionel Messi, Sachine Tedulkar and Mary Kom, these people are themselves evidence that proves the idea supported by the statement wrong. Society is and has always regarded their heroes as ideals, irrespective of status of their life
However, one might aver that with the constant vigilance of media and scrutiny of critics might malign the status quo of this out performers, we can rest assured that these ephemeral accusations have no impact on the contribution these heroes has made to our society.
Conclusively, it is true that society is able to and always will consistently embrace its hero's and regard them ideals no matter how the situations might change while they are living.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-26 AC1990 58 view
2020-01-13 joonho 16 view
2019-11-30 Caveira meyona 50 view
2019-11-17 Xion5 66 view
2019-09-13 Serin Jeon 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Av9ash :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ducation and Social work can be observed for several such instances. To begin ...
^^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...uted situations that pose danger to any nations security. These soldiers once declared ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 596, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...stances of social workers are different than soldiers, they are not less difficult. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bitten'.
Suggestion: bitten
...red to field of sports the situation is bit more complex. In Sports, in addition t...
^^^
Line 6, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'players'' or 'player's'?
Suggestion: players'; player's
...all or cricket or any sport. While some players fame and recognition has been evanescen...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 411, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...nition has been evanescent, others have became legends. We have several examples like ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, well, while, in addition, no doubt, as well as, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2475.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55192699636 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547474747475 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 803.7 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2248825515 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.608695652 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5217391304 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4347826087 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179089131696 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531638227731 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615701535482 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867608384012 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476181458935 0.0667264976115 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.