Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
It is not always easy to find a way to assess a work. Judjing some decisions, expressing a valuable opinion on a certain subject is an instance that needs some consideration. In fact, opinion coming from different people can, often, have importantly different values. More specifically, the attitude of a novice toward a certain matter is to be considered discretely from an expert's one. In my opinion, it almost always true that expert do have more authority in judjuing a work in their field, but it is not correct that interesting judgment can only come from experts.
First of all, it seems wise to spend some words on the term "expert". As a matter of fact, this expression properly refer to those figures that, thanks to professional experiences, studies or personal past, are to be assigned with central roles in the process of judging something in their field of expertise. Aligning to this definition, it is undoubtedly clear that their opinion is, generally speaking, of great value. Think about ancient phylosophers: in the ancient Greece, well-renowned people like Socrates had a noticeable number of followers who literally walked with him across Athenes. In his field, Socrates is who we would call an expert. In fact, his activity simply consisted in talking with his sort of students and judging their speeches, as to teach them how to achieve a perfect reasoning chain by the means of their words and minds. No other people could give a more valuable opinion on those arguments: Socrates furnished his cadets with the only valuable opinions.
Because the author of the above sentence states that his thought is valid in "any given field", it is natural to ask: does this ancient Greece apply to any area of human works? The answer, not easy to give, is more likely to be positive but with exceptions. In fact, if we analyse two totally different fields like economics and arts, we are only apparently dissimilar circumstances. In economics, how could anyone deny that an expert, or at least an experienced man, is needed to take some crucial managing decision? And while in arts it could be said that everyone can give a personal judgment that is just as valuable as that of an expert (because, they would argue, it is art, and as such, it is not as technical-demanding as economics), this proves dramatically decieving. A plethora of critics spend a considerable amount of time studying arts, and, of course, even in this apparently open to fedglings field, experts' opinion does make or brake the judgment.
All this notwithstanding, some areas of work can see novices or totally inexperienced people give an influent opinion. One instance for this is psychology, where, in some experiments and researches, children have to epxress themselves about some specific topics, and their positon about those arguments are of incommensurate valure for pundits. Hence, it can be maintained that, in some specific occurences like the one just exposed, individuals who are not experts of the same field can nonetheless substitute the role of an experienced man and sometimes it is even not possible to do the contrary. Namely, it happens that no expert can be put in the place of an unbiased person.
In conclusion, experts do play the pivotal role in the definition of the quality of a work. In fact, they are called experts properly because their opinion has substantial bases that make them more crucial than other's opinion. This is a particularly generally-valid occurrence, as examples in fields like art and business prove. Nonetheless, inexperienced people can still give an interesting twist to the whole judgment of a piece of work, as stated with the example of children.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes. 50
- Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in 89
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 83
- The following appeared in a newsletter to Canbury’s residents from the president ofPlexma Motors.“I am pleased to announce that Plexma’s new manufacturing site is on schedule to opennext year. In addition to our regular line of cars, Plexma has also 27
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Greece) must be used with a third-person verb: 'applies'.
Suggestion: applies
...atural to ask: does this ancient Greece apply to any area of human works? The answer,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, hence, if, nonetheless, so, still, then, well, while, as to, at least, in conclusion, in fact, of course, sort of, as a matter of fact, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3103.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 616.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03733766234 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98190197535 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99049371943 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 304.0 215.323595506 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 992.7 704.065955056 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5623750812 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.346153846 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19230769231 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25496181856 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738321168145 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640104709014 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155495494252 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533451260642 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.