Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The issue is about the truhefullness of critical judgement of on any field by a expert. It emphasises on the relevency of expert on the filed of judgemnrt. I tend to agree with the topic since only expert opinion can bring about the pros and cos of any field impartially and consciencely.
Critical judgement is supposed to made light on the every aspect on that field. That is why, only experts are required to evaluate the certain field of the study. For instance, if a social scientist is asked to desscribe the Quantum theory, this will be a reckless job to do. Because a insightful scientist expert on quantum theory only can do so, the social scientist will feel mortified and there be will be no value of his judgement. Same consequence can be observed if a quantum theorist is asked to explain certain social phenomenn. Thus, before allocating jobs to any individual, his expertise have to be considered if we wish for any useful result.
Moreover, if a Football analyst is asked to judge a Cricket match, then noone should expect any useful concluison and vice versa. Football analyst is always concerned on communiucation between all eleven players on the field of both the team, the ball and players movement in relative way. On the other hand, howeve, Cricket analyst can be more concerned about individual player and his individual skill with ball and bat. For this reason, since, field of expertise diffres for diiferent experts, only expert with germane knowledge has to be employed to do so.
In constrast, there are some of examples of the individuals who provided the valuable judgemnt on the other field too. For instance, the camera shutter model for the gripper on space use is introduced by a administratory worker of NASA. He was unaware of space condition but he was determined to find economical and efficient solution for gripper. He was also oblivious to the total mechanism of the camera. But he was able to sugggest a beautiful design idea. that is why, sometimes, non expert suggestation can be important t.
In conclusion, to make critical judgement about any field, experts on the relevent field should be highly prefered. Only those can make insighful decision on the particular field of study than the dilettanate one on that field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | tg763622253 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | ghazalsaed1995 | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Dipu2012 | 33 | view |
- write an essay. 3
- In twenty years, there will be fewer cars than there are today. 73
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. 70
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 58
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 35
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss of critical judgement of on any field by a expert. It emphasises on the releve...
^^
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... critical judgement of on any field by a expert. It emphasises on the relevency ...
^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s will be a reckless job to do. Because a insightful scientist expert on quantum ...
^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the examples') or simply say ''some examples''.
Suggestion: some of the examples; some examples
...d to do so. In constrast, there are some of examples of the individuals who provided the val...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e gripper on space use is introduced by a administratory worker of NASA. He was u...
^
Line 7, column 462, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...le to sugggest a beautiful design idea. that is why, sometimes, non expert suggestat...
^^^^
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...t field should be highly prefered. Only those can make insighful decision on the particul...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90414507772 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76624865131 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515544041451 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.02319587 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.1428571429 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47619047619 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154159150115 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545826191462 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547580595123 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106433875797 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591878792102 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.